Competency Based Future Leadership Requirements

Horey, Jeffrey; Fallesen, Jon J.; Morath, Ray; Cronin, Brian; Cassella, Robert; Franks, Will; Smith, Jason A.

doi:10.1037/e741702011-001

Cited by 10 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each of the competencies is further described by secondary components, presented in Table 3, and sample actions for each component (see Horey et al, 2004). The model was developed from several sources, including Army leadership doctrine, reviews of competency and leadership literature, and input from subject matter experts.…”

Section: Model Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This effort resulted in the development of a core leader model which is described in terms of eight competencies, 55 components, and over 200 sample actions and behaviors (Horey, Fallesen, Morath, Cronin, Cassella, Franks, & Smith, 2004). A series of research efforts were recently concluded to establish evidence of validity of the model and identify situational variations in the model.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Criterion-Related Validation Study of the Army Core Leader Competency Model

Horey¹,

Harvey²,

Curtin³

et al. 2007

PsycEXTRA Dataset

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Model Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Criterion-Related Validation Study of the Army Core Leader Competency Model

Horey¹,

Harvey²,

Curtin³

et al. 2007

PsycEXTRA Dataset

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The Leadership Requirements Model has been through a series of research-based studies that have demonstrated its reliability and validity. Its conceptualization began with the identification of future leader requirements (Horey, Fallesen, Morath, Cassella, Franks, & Smith, 2004). Actual validation was accomplished via Horey, Harvey, Curtin, KellerGlaze, Morath, & Fallesen (2006, April).…”

Section: Leadership Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Commander's Handbook for Unit Leader Development

Aude¹,

Keller-Glaze²,

Riley³

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

show abstract

“…Although the need for influence skills and interpersonal adaptability in the Army environment has been well established (Department of the Army, 2001;Horey, Fallesen, Morath, Cronin, Cassella, Franks, & Smith, 2004;Wong, Gerrars, Kidd, Pricone, & Swengros, 2003), little formal training exists to help new Army leaders enhance these skills. To address this gap, the Army Research Institute's Leader Development Research Unit (ARI-LDRU) has recently initiated work on the Army Technology Objective (ATO) titled Accelerating Leader Development.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Awareness and Leader Influence: A Proposed Model and Training Intervention

Mueller-Hanson¹,

Swartout²,

Morewitz³

et al. 2007

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A leader's ability to influence others is likely related to the leader's level of social awareness (knowing how one is perceived by others in that environment.) Based on perceptions of the social environment, a leader must also alter behaviors as needed to more effectively relate to others, a process which has been termed "interpersonal adaptability". Interpersonal adaptability is central to the role of the leader who must use influence and persuasion to successfully accomplish the mission through the work of subordinates. The objectives of this research are to develop a model of social influence, to propose training, and to pilot test the concepts. To meet these objectives, we first provide an overview of the relationship between social awareness and influence. Second, we describe a model of social awareness and influence. Third, we describe how these concepts link to the leader competencies defined in FM 6-22. Next, we discuss implications of this research for training leaders to enhance their social awareness and influence skills, and we present the concepts that were developed for training these skills. Finally, we describe how these concepts were pilot tested, and we present the results and our conclusions from the pilot. Procedure:Based on a review of relevant research, a model of social awareness and influence was developed and the factors hypothesized to impact the model were identified. The results of an expert rating task revealed that experience influencing others, knowledge of non-verbal behavior and cultural norms, communication/persuasion skills, political skills, social intelligence, metacognition, and self-awareness were the factors that were most likely to have a high impact on the social awareness and influence process and that could potentially be improved through training. Consequently several training concepts were identified: knowledge of the social awareness and influence process, knowledge of/skill in reading verbal and non-verbal cues of others, and knowledge of/skill in using influence tactics. Using a combination of commercially available tools and customized content, we developed and pilot tested a six-hour social awareness and influence training program with 72 NCOs and Company-grade officers.viiiThe pilot test served a dual purpose: (1) to test the various training concepts to determine their suitability for ongoing use and (2) to make some initial determinations about whether social awareness and influence skills could be improved through training. Evaluation data were collected at two levels to assess the effectiveness of the training: participant reactions (level 1) and acquisition of new knowledge and skills (level 2). The level 1 evaluation was conducted using a survey administered at the end of each training session. A pre/post test design was used to conduct the level 2 evaluation -participants were assessed via a test of nonverbal sensitivity and a role-play exercise both before and after the training on their ability to read verbal and nonverbal cues and on adjusting their...

show abstract

Competency Based Future Leadership Requirements

Cited by 10 publications

References 2 publications

A Criterion-Related Validation Study of the Army Core Leader Competency Model

A Criterion-Related Validation Study of the Army Core Leader Competency Model

Commander's Handbook for Unit Leader Development

Social Awareness and Leader Influence: A Proposed Model and Training Intervention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About