The classic model for nuclear receptors (NRs) 2 and the subfamily of steroid hormone receptors (SHRs) has difficulty explaining important aspects of SHR/NR function. The classic model divides SHRs into three domains, ligand-binding (LBD), DNA-binding (DBD), and N-terminal (NTD), and has served well ( Fig. 1), but some of its premises are limiting its usefulness. Phenomena for which the classic model is inadequate include tissue-and cell-specific responses to individual ligands, differing transcriptional responses imparted by DNA sequences of response elements (REs), selective effects of isoform-specific activation function 1 (AF1) regions in the NTD, the widely differing size and sequence of NTDs, and the lack of stable tertiary structure in NTDs. Theory and data suggest that such limitations stem from two conceptual weaknesses in the classic model: 1) the presumption that the major NR domains consist of structurally stable peptides and 2) the failure of the model to account for the essential allosteric nature of SHRs/NRs. Herein, we discuss each of the classic domains, citing examples that indicate their structurally dynamic nature. We then show how the intrinsic disorder (ID) found in regions of SHRs/NRs can optimize allosteric responses.