2021
DOI: 10.1002/smj.3366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing on freemium: Digital competition with network effects

Abstract: Research Summary “Freemium” product strategies—where a free basic version of a product is offered alongside a full “premium” paid version—are often used by companies to attempt to increase the size of their user base and benefit from network effects. However, there is limited empirical evidence of how using freemium strategies impacts firm revenues. We empirically investigate how the strengthening of network effects on the Apple App Store influenced product sales of firms using freemium strategies, contrasting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How do our findings replicate to these different platforms and social features? A study by Boudreau et al (2020) documents dynamics similar to ours in the context of Apple's App Store: An increase in market‐level network effects benefitted freemium market leaders more than paid market leaders. Thus, in line with our arguments, they document that network effects are more beneficial to freemium than paid superstars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How do our findings replicate to these different platforms and social features? A study by Boudreau et al (2020) documents dynamics similar to ours in the context of Apple's App Store: An increase in market‐level network effects benefitted freemium market leaders more than paid market leaders. Thus, in line with our arguments, they document that network effects are more beneficial to freemium than paid superstars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In so doing, we contribute to our understanding of when the freemium business model works (Kumar, 2014), and how freemium strategies differ from strategies for paid products (Bapna et al, 2018; Bond et al, 2019; Eckhardt, 2016; Lee & Csaszar, 2020; Pauwels & Weiss, 2008; Rietveld, 2018; Shi et al, 2019; Tidhar & Eisenhardt, 2020). 1 Our research relates to work by Boudreau, Jeppesen, and Miric (2020) who study how a change in market‐level network effects impacts the performance of freemium versus paid market leaders. We complement their work by identifying product design features as an important—and strategic—predictor of which freemium products become market leaders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the market of software or mobile apps, many products within the same niche have a similar set of prices. Indeed, in the mobile apps markets where the majority of products are free and among those that are non‐zero price, the differences in price are relatively trivial (e.g., $0.99 difference) (Boudreau, Jeppesen, & Miric, 2022). In such instances, demand is not shaped by price as much as taste‐based features or quality (Reimers & Waldfogel, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, the literature on platforms and platform business models has been dominated by B2C examples, so the main theoretical arguments fit best with B2C contexts (Cennamo, 2021;Rietveld and Schilling, 2021). B2B platforms are likely to include some similar features acknowledged in the existing platform literature, such as the existence of network effects in relation to the quality and heterogeneity of complementors (Boudreau et al, 2022;McIntyre and Srinivasan, 2017), the distinctive role of a platform owner (or orchestrator) (Thomas and Ritala, 2022), and the generative value of the B2B platform and associated ecosystem (Thomas and Tee, 2022). However, there are also major differences between the two contexts.…”
Section: Platforms Ecosystems and Business Model Innovation In B2b Ma...mentioning
confidence: 99%