2022
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphys.12.2.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing topological orders in three dimensions

Abstract: We study the competition between two different topological orders in three dimensions by considering the X-cube model and the three-dimensional toric code. The corresponding Hamiltonian can be decomposed into two commuting parts, one of which displays a self-dual spectrum. To determine the phase diagram, we compute the high-order series expansions of the ground-state energy in all limiting cases. Apart from the topological order related to the toric code and the fractonic order related to the X-cube model, we … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This view also holds near the TC phase if one interpret the electric string turning point as a monopole, and the resonant state of an electric charge octupole around an elementary cube satisfying ∏ l∈ σ x l = −1 as a fracton. Viewed in the basis of the topological defects, such tuning parameter couples to the onsite diagonal mass for a given single topological defect, which explains the first order transition found by the authors [38]. In contrast, the gauge fluctuations are interactions between topological defects at different locations, such as the pair annihilation of the monopoles from adjacent vertices, or the loop fluctuation of the magnetic flux penetrating different faces.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies Into the Fracton Qptmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This view also holds near the TC phase if one interpret the electric string turning point as a monopole, and the resonant state of an electric charge octupole around an elementary cube satisfying ∏ l∈ σ x l = −1 as a fracton. Viewed in the basis of the topological defects, such tuning parameter couples to the onsite diagonal mass for a given single topological defect, which explains the first order transition found by the authors [38]. In contrast, the gauge fluctuations are interactions between topological defects at different locations, such as the pair annihilation of the monopoles from adjacent vertices, or the loop fluctuation of the magnetic flux penetrating different faces.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies Into the Fracton Qptmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[36] to pin the location of transition point. In a more recent paper the authors also use the same series expansion method to study a phase diagram of directly interpolating the Hamiltonian between the 3D toric code and X cube model [38], by tuning the coupling constant of the XC inplane star and cube stabilizer terms from a TC phase. Although their phase diagram also consists of both 3D TC and XC phases, bearing certain similarity to our phase diagram, the nature of their phase transitions are qualitatively sharply distinct from ours: by directly tuning the inplane star stabilizer terms Â+ , the authors therein are essentially tuning the rest mass of a monopole in XC phase; likewise, tuning the cube stabilizer terms ∏ l∈ σ x l is equivalent to tuning the rest mass of a fracton defect.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies Into the Fracton Qptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important approach for understanding fracton phases such as the X-cube model is to study quantum phase transitions out of such phases [37,38]. An important issue is to consider different indicators which can characterize a fracton phase transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Projective cluster-additive transformation 12 3.1 Cluster-additivity for single particle states 12 3.2 Cluster-additivity for multi-particle excitations 13 3.3 Explicit form of transformation in terms of projection operators 15 1 Introduction…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%