2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.82.224404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competing two-phase coexistence in doped manganites: Direct observations byin situLorentz electron microscopy

Abstract: We examined thin epitaxial films La 5/8−y Pr y Ca 3/8 MnO 3 ͑LPCMO: y = 0.275− 0.3͒ in situ by Lorentz transmission electron microscopy ͑TEM͒ and other microscopy methods. Clear evidence was obtained for the competing two-phase coexistence of antiferromagnetic charge-ordered ͑CO͒ and ferromagnetic ͑FM͒ phases that exhibit mesoscale phase separation below the metal-to-insulator transition ͑MIT͒ at ϳ164 K. In addition, we observed some regions of mixed CO-and FM-domain contrast attributed earlier to formation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the dynamics of PS state may be inferred from the transports through a manganite nanowire [13], but these measurements are limited to a narrow temperature range with sufficient conductivity. To date, the PS state with distinct physical properties has been visualized by various microscopy techniques such as scanning tunneling microscopy [14], electron microscopy [15], photoemission spectroscopy [16], magnetic force microscopy [17,18], and recently near-field microwave impedance microscopy (MIM) [19]. However, most of these studies focus on the static phase-separation.…”
Section: Page 2 Of 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the dynamics of PS state may be inferred from the transports through a manganite nanowire [13], but these measurements are limited to a narrow temperature range with sufficient conductivity. To date, the PS state with distinct physical properties has been visualized by various microscopy techniques such as scanning tunneling microscopy [14], electron microscopy [15], photoemission spectroscopy [16], magnetic force microscopy [17,18], and recently near-field microwave impedance microscopy (MIM) [19]. However, most of these studies focus on the static phase-separation.…”
Section: Page 2 Of 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics are representative of a first order phase transition and have been observed in La 1-x-y Pr y Ca x MnO 3 for wide range of x and y. [6][7][8][9][10][11]14,15 The magnetic liquid freezes at temperatures below the glass transition temperature (T g ) and is characterised by thermally reversible M-T and -T. Although the precise origin of the glass transition is still unclear, it is believed to be driven by the accommodation strain between the interfaces created by the distinct structural symmetries of FMM and AFM/COI phases and has been called as strain glass (SRG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[1][2][3][4] Among the large number of compounds investigated for strong intrinsic phase separation, 1 La 1-x-y Pr y Ca x MnO 3 (x>0.3, y>0.4) have emerged as the representative of mesoscopic PS. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] One of the unique feature of this family is the keen competition and delicate balance between the FM and AFM magnetic orders over a wide range of x and y values. The balance between FM and AFM phases gives rise to magnetic frustration, which in turn leads to non-equilibrium states below the FM transition temperature (T C ), e.g., the magnetically disordered liquid which is believed to transforms into a random strain glass (SRG) below the glass transition temperature (T g ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the dynamics of PS state may be inferred from the transports through a manganite nanowire [13], but these measurements are limited to a narrow temperature range with sufficient conductivity. To date, the PS state with distinct physical properties has been visualized by various microscopy techniques such as scanning tunneling microscopy [14], electron microscopy [15], photoemission spectroscopy [16], magnetic force microscopy [17,18], and recently near-field microwave impedance microscopy (MIM) [19]. However, most of these studies focus on the static phase-separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%