1973
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500010038x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition Between Established Tree Roots and Newly Seeded Kentucky Bluegrass1

Abstract: Landscape situations frequently are such that trees may be well established when an attempt is made to establish turf. This occurs when renovating an old lawn, changing type of turf, or where new subdivisions are located in areas of established trees. This study was initiated to assess the effects of established silver maple (Acer saccharinum) and honey‐locust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.) roots on newly seeded Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis). A connecting pot technique was used to maintain nearly uniform ligh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree shade represents, arguably, the most stressful of these environments for the establishment and persistence of turfgrass, because it simultaneously reduces light intensity and alters the red:far-red ratio of sunlight (Bell and Danneberger, 1999;Wherley et al, 2005). Changes in microclimate (Giesler et al, 2000) and root competition (Whitcomb, 1972;Whitcomb and Roberts, 1973) associated with tree shade further exacerbate the situation. Shade-avoidance responses by turfgrasses often culminate in undesirable morphological changes, including increased leaf elongation, internode length, and plant height as well as decreased tillering and root:shoot ratio (Shnyder and Nelson, 1989;Tan and Qian, 2003;Wherley et al, 2005;Winstead and Ward, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree shade represents, arguably, the most stressful of these environments for the establishment and persistence of turfgrass, because it simultaneously reduces light intensity and alters the red:far-red ratio of sunlight (Bell and Danneberger, 1999;Wherley et al, 2005). Changes in microclimate (Giesler et al, 2000) and root competition (Whitcomb, 1972;Whitcomb and Roberts, 1973) associated with tree shade further exacerbate the situation. Shade-avoidance responses by turfgrasses often culminate in undesirable morphological changes, including increased leaf elongation, internode length, and plant height as well as decreased tillering and root:shoot ratio (Shnyder and Nelson, 1989;Tan and Qian, 2003;Wherley et al, 2005;Winstead and Ward, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T urfgrass growth and development under shade is inhibited by reduced photosynthesis (Jiang et al, 2004; Miller et al, 2005), increased disease pressure (Beard, 1965; Vargas and Beard, 1981) due to extended morning dew duration (Dudeck and Peacock, 1992; Williams et al, 1996), reduced carbohydrate production (Bunnell et al, 2005b, 2005c), tree root competition (Whitcomb, 1972; Whitcomb and Roberts, 1973), and reduced lateral stem growth (Beard, 1997). Another factor limiting turfgrass growth and development under shade are various types of filtered light.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant vigor and hardiness are decreased and succulence is increased by shade (6). Tolerances to temperature extremes, moisture stress and wear are lessened, and susceptibility to pests is increased in shad,~d plants (13,14). Chlorophyll content is also increas,~d while respiration, transpiration rate, carbohydrate/N ratio, and osmotic pressure decrease in turf grown in low amounts of light (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%