Competition Between Morphological Words and Multiword Expressions

Abstract

the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Empty nominalization over antonymous juxtaposition/coordination and the emergence of a new syntactic construction

“…In general, the productivity of these patterns seems to be related to the productivity of morphological compounding in ways of complementation or competition (cf. Booij 2019;Cetnarowska 2019;Masini 2019a;Schlücker 2019, for instance), and the existence of a particular phrasal form may (but need not) lead to the blocking of the formation of a corresponding morphological compound and vice versa. In German, nominal syntactic compounds are less frequent than in other languages, which can be related to the high productivity of nominal morphological compounding (cf.…”

Research on the Reform of ID Course under the Background of 3E—A Case Study of ID in Sichuan Normal University

“…For instance, Chinese shunhua 'smooth' appeared 79 times in the collected customer reviews of negative ion hair dryers to describe their impact on customers' hair; shunhua 'smooth' might be favored apart from shang because smoothness of the hair is overtly visible and directly related to the effects of negative ions, thus capturing more attention from speakers. In addition, there might exist the phenomenon of competition (MacWhinney et al 2014;Masini 2019) in the lexical choices; for example, hu yan 'protect eyes', which appeared 90 times in the collected customer reviews of e-readers, might be a collocation and compete with the use of shang. Nonetheless, the interlingual comparison results support the correlation (not determination) between prototypicality and NLS, while leaving room for discussions of other factors.…”

Paradigmatic relations in Construction Morphology: the case of Dutch Noun+Verb compounds

“…Paradigmatic relations are presupposed in the competition between word formation processes (Van Marle 1985, Dammel & Kempf 2018, Rainer et al eds. 2019, and in the competition between morphological and phrasal constructions (Booij 2018, Masini 2019.…”