2015
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa4055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between MPS1 and microtubules at kinetochores regulates spindle checkpoint signaling

Abstract: Cell division progresses to anaphase only after all chromosomes are connected to spindle microtubules through kinetochores and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is satisfied. We show that the amino-terminal localization module of the SAC protein kinase MPS1 (monopolar spindle 1) directly interacts with the HEC1 (highly expressed in cancer 1) calponin homology domain in the NDC80 (nuclear division cycle 80) kinetochore complex in vitro, in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Microtubule polymers disrupted t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
286
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
15
286
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 G and H). During the revision of our manuscript, two groups reported the competition between Mps1 and MT for Ndc80C binding (54,55), supporting our conclusion that the kinetochore localization of inactive Mps1 induces chromosome misalignment by interfering with MT attachment to Ndc80C.…”
Section: Mis12csupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 G and H). During the revision of our manuscript, two groups reported the competition between Mps1 and MT for Ndc80C binding (54,55), supporting our conclusion that the kinetochore localization of inactive Mps1 induces chromosome misalignment by interfering with MT attachment to Ndc80C.…”
Section: Mis12csupporting
confidence: 80%
“…S6B). In our opinion, the competition between Mps1 and MT for binding with Ndc80C would not be sufficient to discriminate between correct and incorrect attachment (54,55). Upon the establishment of proper bioriented kinetochore-MT attachment, maximal intrakinetochore tension pulls aurora B away from outer kinetochores (61).…”
Section: Mis12cmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One model is that kinetochore-microtubule attachment removes the SAC kinase Mps1 from kinetochores to silence the SAC, which is supported by recent observations in mammalian cells (Hiruma et al 2015;Ji et al 2015). Research work in budding yeast supports the model that the interaction of microtubuleassociated Dam1 complex with the Ndc80 kinetochore complex separates Ndc80-associated Mps1 from its substrates to trigger SAC silencing (Aravamudhan et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…44 However, this inhibition was not absolutely competitive in nature because the Mps1 interface on Hec1 is in close proximity but not identical to the microtubule interface. 45 These studies thus point toward a delicate regulation by Aurora B, which on one hand phosphorylates the Ndc80 basic tail and weakens the MT binding while on the other hand, augments Mps1 binding to Nuf2 that in turn promotes Knl1 phosphorylation and BUB1 recruitment. 44,45 In accordance with these observations, a recent study demonstrates that microtubule attachment factually induces physical separation between Mps1 kinase (docked on CH domain of Ndc80) and phosphodomain of Spc105 (Knl1 ortholog in yeast) to abrogate MELT phosphorylation and SAC silencing.…”
Section: How the Sac Gets The Axe: Integrating Kinetochore Microtubulmentioning
confidence: 97%