1962
DOI: 10.2307/4040784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between Peas Grown for Processing and Weeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect was on the yields rather than on the numbers of weeds. This is in accordance with earlier studies of competition between weeds and cultivated plants, which likewise have demonstrated that dense stands of cultivated crops are effective in reducing weed yields (Winifred and Brenchley 1917, Granström 1962, Nelson and Nylund 1962, Weber and Staniforth 1957, Wiese et al 1964. Nitrogen fertilization has been found to increase the numbers and yields of weeds in cereal crops (Suomela and Paatela 1962).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The effect was on the yields rather than on the numbers of weeds. This is in accordance with earlier studies of competition between weeds and cultivated plants, which likewise have demonstrated that dense stands of cultivated crops are effective in reducing weed yields (Winifred and Brenchley 1917, Granström 1962, Nelson and Nylund 1962, Weber and Staniforth 1957, Wiese et al 1964. Nitrogen fertilization has been found to increase the numbers and yields of weeds in cereal crops (Suomela and Paatela 1962).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For a long-lasting effect, the composition of cover crop residues should delay residue decomposition and N mineralisation. Parameters for the biochemical makes them susceptible to weed competition (Nelson & Nylund, 1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nelson and Nylund (1962) Increasing field pea plant density significantly reduced weed biomass in 2 of 3 yr. Several studies have shown that increasing field pea populations reduce weed biomass (Marx und Hagedo* 196l; Lawson and Topham 1985; iownley-Smith-and Wright 1994), but none reported significant di-fferences among cultivars' In this study, while the The cultivar-by-seeding-rate interaction was significant n^J994 and 1995 only, while the cultivar 2n4 segling rate effects were significant in 1993. In all 3 yr, seed /ields increased with field pea plant density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%