2015
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition between recombination and extraction of free charges determines the fill factor of organic solar cells

Abstract: Among the parameters that characterize a solar cell and define its power-conversion efficiency, the fill factor is the least well understood, making targeted improvements difficult. Here we quantify the competition between charge extraction and recombination by using a single parameter θ, and we demonstrate that this parameter is directly related to the fill factor of many different bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Our finding is supported by experimental measurements on 15 different donor:acceptor combination… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

36
554
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(596 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
36
554
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the good photovoltaic performance of the J51 -based all-PSCs should be also ascribed to the lower series resistance ( R S ) of 7.65 Ω cm 2 and higher shunt resistance ( R p ) of 1.09 kΩ cm 2 of the devices in comparison to the J50 -based devices with R S = 11.25 Ω cm 2 and R p = 0.69 kΩ cm 2 . [ 28 ] For investigating the exciton dissociation and charge transfer behavior in the polymer blend of the polymer donor ( J50 or J51 ) and polymer acceptor N2200 , we measured the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the polymers and the polymer blends, as shown in Figure 3 b. According to the absorption spectra of the polymer donors and the polymer acceptor (Figure 1 c), there is an absorption band in 425-650 nm for the polymer donor J50 and J51 fi lms, and there are two absorption bands in the range of 300-425 nm, and 650-850 nm for N2200 fi lm.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201504629mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the good photovoltaic performance of the J51 -based all-PSCs should be also ascribed to the lower series resistance ( R S ) of 7.65 Ω cm 2 and higher shunt resistance ( R p ) of 1.09 kΩ cm 2 of the devices in comparison to the J50 -based devices with R S = 11.25 Ω cm 2 and R p = 0.69 kΩ cm 2 . [ 28 ] For investigating the exciton dissociation and charge transfer behavior in the polymer blend of the polymer donor ( J50 or J51 ) and polymer acceptor N2200 , we measured the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the polymers and the polymer blends, as shown in Figure 3 b. According to the absorption spectra of the polymer donors and the polymer acceptor (Figure 1 c), there is an absorption band in 425-650 nm for the polymer donor J50 and J51 fi lms, and there are two absorption bands in the range of 300-425 nm, and 650-850 nm for N2200 fi lm.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201504629mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[ 28 ] In general, J sc has a power-law dependence on P light ( J sc ∝ P light α ), where power-law component (α) should be unity when the bimolecular recombination of the charge carriers is negligible. As shown in The average PCE is obtained from over 15 devices; b) Calculated from the inverse slope at V = V OC in J -V curves under illumination; c)…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201504629mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, high-performance low-bandgap polymers should also exhibit high charge transport ability in order to achieve high fi ll factors (FF). [ 24,25 ] Among the reported low bandgap polymers, diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) has been a commonly used building block due to its excellent properties such as strong absorption covering near-infrared and visible regions, its electron defi cient nature and high charge carrier mobility. A polymer (DT-PDPP2T-TT) has been reported as the best low-bandgap polymer, which could achieve an impressive short-circuit current density ( J sc) of 20.07 mA cm −2 with diphenolether as additive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, given the rather standard transport characteristics observed, one is led to suspect that favorable recombination is at the heart of the thick junction performance. This is consistent with Bartesaghi et al [182], who recently pointed out that the overall charge collection efficiency (which determines the FF and the PCE) is a result of the competition between recombination and charge extraction. In what is to follow, we study the recombination coefficient by applying 4 independent methods in steady state and transient modes, dark and illuminated.…”
Section: Electron and Hole Mobilitiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Recombination is non-geminate if the two charges in the encounter originated from different photoexcitations, and is the most common explanation for photocurrent losses under operational bias [91,92,162,182,183]. In forward bias, the driving field for extraction decreases, which leads to a build-up of electron (n) and hole (p) density in the bulk of the heterojunction.…”
Section: Electric-field Dependent Geminate Recombination Losses Inintmentioning
confidence: 99%