2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition, coinfection and strain replacement in models of Bordetella pertussis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other pathogen systems, the role of neutral vs. non-neutral forces were also investigated, which revealed unforeseen patterns. For example, Nicoli et al 42 found that strain replacement is more likely under generalized immunity than strain-specific immunity when vaccination is applied in Pertussis. Cobey and Lipsitch 43 demonstrated that weak specific immunity together with generalized immunity permit the coexistence of strains with weak competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other pathogen systems, the role of neutral vs. non-neutral forces were also investigated, which revealed unforeseen patterns. For example, Nicoli et al 42 found that strain replacement is more likely under generalized immunity than strain-specific immunity when vaccination is applied in Pertussis. Cobey and Lipsitch 43 demonstrated that weak specific immunity together with generalized immunity permit the coexistence of strains with weak competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is at one end of a spectrum, and modellers do not choose to model transmission of these infections simultaneously (precisely because they would not affect each other). However, low values of c are implicitly assumed by models (of the same infection with different strains, e.g., resistant and sensitive) that do not take competition into account, for example, by including co-infection in a way that dramatically reduces competition (see also the discussion in Nicoli et al (2015) ). The final model in (2) contains, in the first equation of (2), terms for: entry from susceptibles into X ( F x S ), re-infection of X with the Y strain ( κF y X ), re-entry to X from duals re-infected with , clearance of X ( u x X ), clearance of the Y strain in duals (1 − c ) u y D , and acquisition of resistance plus competitive release of resistance due to treatment ( μ + Tr ) X .…”
Section: Between-host Model: Two Ends Of a Continuummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is at one end of a spectrum, and modellers do not choose to model transmission of these infections simultaneously (precisely because they would not affect each other). However, low values of c are implicitly assumed by models (of the same infection with different strains, e.g., resistant and sensitive) that do not take competition into account, for example, by including co-infection in a way that dramatically reduces competition (see also the discussion in Nicoli et al (2015) ).…”
Section: Between-host Model: Two Ends Of a Continuummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main driving force for this strain evolution is thought to be immune pressure from vaccination, with emergence of ‘vaccine escape’ mutants [38,39]. A study by Preston’s group on strains from a 2012 outbreak in the UK and other strains from additional outbreaks globally found that acellular vaccine antigen-encoding genes [pertussis toxin ( ptx ), pertactin ( prn ), Fha ( fha ), and Fim ( fim )] are evolving at a significantly higher rate than genes encoding other surface antigens not included in the vaccine [40 ▪▪ ].…”
Section: Emergence Of B Pertussis Strains With Increased Virulence?mentioning
confidence: 99%