1989
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1097(89)90105-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition for nitrate between denitrifying Pseudomonas stutzeri and nitrate ammonifying enterobacteria

Abstract: Competition for nitrate between nitrate ammonifying enterobacteria and a denitrifying pseudomonad was studied in electron acceptor‐limited chenostats. In pure cultures, using different carbon and energy sources, the C/N‐ratio needed for denitrification is far lower than that required for nitrate ammonification. In mixed cultures of Citrobacter freundii and Pseudomonas stutzeri, competing for nitrate with l‐lactate as electron donor, the nitrate ammonifying organism dominated at dilution rates of D ≤ 0.14 h−1. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the aerenchymatous plant is important for the uptake of nitrate and the release of oxygen into the root zone. Furthermore, the concentrations and the ratio of the available electron donor and acceptor were found to be less important than previously reported [12,20,25,26,27], at least in these freshwater saturated sediments in the presence of an aerenchymatous plant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of the aerenchymatous plant is important for the uptake of nitrate and the release of oxygen into the root zone. Furthermore, the concentrations and the ratio of the available electron donor and acceptor were found to be less important than previously reported [12,20,25,26,27], at least in these freshwater saturated sediments in the presence of an aerenchymatous plant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…However, some studies showed that DNRA could be overestimated in waterlogged or estuarine sediments, due to incomplete blockage of nitrous oxide reductase by acetylene or nitrate uptake by microphytes [4,21]. The main factors regulating which of the two nitratereducing processes will be favored are the concentrations and ratios of available electron donors and acceptors [20,27]. Aerenchymatous plants create an oxic-anoxic interface in the root zone by releasing oxygen into this zone [2,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summer, August 1989; (4-) winter, January 1990 observations suggest that in summer the ambient NO: concentration is below, though in winter well above, the half-saturation value (K,) for denitrification, which is usually in the range of 2 to 15 PM (Murray et al 1989, Rehr & Klemme 1989. Once the NOT supply from the overlying water to the denitrification zone increases again (October), other mechanisms are responsible for the considerable variation in denitrification rates in winter and early spring.…”
Section: Fig 5 Porewater Profiles Of Nitrate Concentration (Pm) (-A-)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, any model of nitrate reduction must account for the effect of the regulating factors. These include temperature (King & Nedwell 1984 Ogilvie et al 1997a), the labile carbon:nitrate ratio (Rehr & Klemme 1989), pH (Kim et al 1997) nitrate concentrations (King & Nedwell 1987) and the type of organic substrate used (Herbert 1982). The aim of this work is to develop a diagenetic model with a more complete description of nitrate reduction by including DNRA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%