2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-937x.00177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation

Abstract: Is more intense product market competition and imitation good or bad for growth? This question is addressed in the context of an endogenous growth model with ''step-by-step'' innovations, in which technological laggards must first catch up with the leading-edge technology before battling for technological leadership in the future. In contrast to earlier Schumpeterian models in which innovations are always made by outsider firms who earn no rents if they fail to innovate and become monopolies if they do innovat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
642
1
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 867 publications
(704 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
48
642
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…To reconcile theory with evidence, we extended our basic Schumpeterian model by allowing for step-by-step innovation in the Schumpeterian growth model (see Aghion et al 1997Aghion et al , 2001). Namely, a firm that is currently behind the technological leader in the same sector or industry must catch up with the leader before becoming a leader itself.…”
Section: Growth Meets Io and Our Dialog With Empiricistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconcile theory with evidence, we extended our basic Schumpeterian model by allowing for step-by-step innovation in the Schumpeterian growth model (see Aghion et al 1997Aghion et al , 2001). Namely, a firm that is currently behind the technological leader in the same sector or industry must catch up with the leader before becoming a leader itself.…”
Section: Growth Meets Io and Our Dialog With Empiricistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment introduced competition for both public and private providers, which might have affected quality also of publicly provided rehabilitation (for contributions that point out that more competition may stimulate innovations, see for instance, Aghion et al 2001Aghion et al , 2005. The private providers, however, faced additional competition since they competed for contracts to participate in the experiment and competed for clients through consumer Taken together, the theory about incentives suggests that private providers faced stronger incentives for providing efficient rehabilitation in terms of differences in ownership, the degree of competition, the importance of reputation building and the terms of compensation.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, according to Aghion et al (2005), the relationship is an inverted-U, where competition encourages innovation in firms that operate at similar technological levels and discourages innovation in laggard firms, all caused by the difference between the firm's pre-and post-innovation rents. For further analysis see Hart (1980); Schmidt (1997); Aghion et al (2001); Vives (2008) ;Schmutzler (2009Schmutzler ( , 2013Nickell (1996) ;Blundell, Griffith, and Reenen (1999); Aghion et al (2005); Aghion and Griffith (2006); Aghion et al (2014).…”
Section: A Weak Innovation Climatementioning
confidence: 99%