“…An important, and now perhaps more popular, alternative to the optical turbidostat is the pHauxostat (Martin & Hempfling, 1976;Stouthamer & Bettenhaussen, 1976;Oltmann et al, 1978;MacBean et al, 1979;Bungay et al, 1981 ;Rice & Hempfling, 1985;Minkevich et al, 1989;Fraleigh et al, 1989Fraleigh et al, , 1990von Schulthess et al, 1990), in which the growth-associated microbial production of acid (or, in principle, base) causes a change in pH which is returned to its set-point not by the addition of alkali per se but by the addition of a more alkaline nutrient medium; the biomass level in the steady state is then determined by the buffering power of the medium (whilst the dilution rate again corresponds to a value approaching pmax for the medium and conditions employed). The pHauxostat is relatively straightforward to implement, but has the disadvantages that (i) the biomass level is still set indirectly, (ii) there is a limit to the range of buffering powers which can be provided, and (iii) the cells must actually change the external pH by a substantial amount as a result of their catabolic activities [which is not always the case (Watson, 1972;Firstenberg-Eden & Eden, 1984)l.…”