1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01022422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition in a pHauxostat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important, and now perhaps more popular, alternative to the optical turbidostat is the pHauxostat (Martin & Hempfling, 1976;Stouthamer & Bettenhaussen, 1976;Oltmann et al, 1978;MacBean et al, 1979;Bungay et al, 1981 ;Rice & Hempfling, 1985;Minkevich et al, 1989;Fraleigh et al, 1989Fraleigh et al, , 1990von Schulthess et al, 1990), in which the growth-associated microbial production of acid (or, in principle, base) causes a change in pH which is returned to its set-point not by the addition of alkali per se but by the addition of a more alkaline nutrient medium; the biomass level in the steady state is then determined by the buffering power of the medium (whilst the dilution rate again corresponds to a value approaching pmax for the medium and conditions employed). The pHauxostat is relatively straightforward to implement, but has the disadvantages that (i) the biomass level is still set indirectly, (ii) there is a limit to the range of buffering powers which can be provided, and (iii) the cells must actually change the external pH by a substantial amount as a result of their catabolic activities [which is not always the case (Watson, 1972;Firstenberg-Eden & Eden, 1984)l.…”
Section: Aberystwythmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important, and now perhaps more popular, alternative to the optical turbidostat is the pHauxostat (Martin & Hempfling, 1976;Stouthamer & Bettenhaussen, 1976;Oltmann et al, 1978;MacBean et al, 1979;Bungay et al, 1981 ;Rice & Hempfling, 1985;Minkevich et al, 1989;Fraleigh et al, 1989Fraleigh et al, , 1990von Schulthess et al, 1990), in which the growth-associated microbial production of acid (or, in principle, base) causes a change in pH which is returned to its set-point not by the addition of alkali per se but by the addition of a more alkaline nutrient medium; the biomass level in the steady state is then determined by the buffering power of the medium (whilst the dilution rate again corresponds to a value approaching pmax for the medium and conditions employed). The pHauxostat is relatively straightforward to implement, but has the disadvantages that (i) the biomass level is still set indirectly, (ii) there is a limit to the range of buffering powers which can be provided, and (iii) the cells must actually change the external pH by a substantial amount as a result of their catabolic activities [which is not always the case (Watson, 1972;Firstenberg-Eden & Eden, 1984)l.…”
Section: Aberystwythmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation shown in Figure 5 is more complicated than BOICS in that it requires the control of two pumps, but it may turn out to have other advantages. In view of the above discussion, the CO 2 -stat could be replaced by a turbidostat, pHauxostat (Martin and Hempfling, 1976;Schulthess et al, 1990), permittistat (Markx et al, 1991), or nutristat (Kleman et al, 1991;Mori et al, 1983). In the latter case, a nutrient concentration is directly measured and controlled.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Boicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Continuing the theme of comparative 'growth-omics', the growth rates of yeasts are significantly slower than those of bacteria, the record (in terms of rate of biomass doubling) apparently being Kluyveromyces marxianus with a doubling time of some 52 min [498] (a growth rate approximately twice that of S. cerevisiae [541,[545][546][547]). This was achieved [498] via a different kind of growth rate selection in a kind of 'turbidostat' called a pHauxostat [548][549][550]).…”
Section: Growth Rate Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%