1996
DOI: 10.4098/at.arch.96-28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition in sympatric white-tailed deer and cattle populations in southern pine forests of Oklahoma and Arkansas, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results support dietary analyses (Jenks et al 1996), which indicated that cattle can negatively affect deer condition in pine-broomsedge forests. Heavy cattle stocking (> 5 ha/AU) seemed to negatively affect deer reproductive rate, as well as morphometric and biochemical indices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results support dietary analyses (Jenks et al 1996), which indicated that cattle can negatively affect deer condition in pine-broomsedge forests. Heavy cattle stocking (> 5 ha/AU) seemed to negatively affect deer reproductive rate, as well as morphometric and biochemical indices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Density, winter nutrition, and competitive interactions can negatively affect deer condition and reproduction and predispose deer to disease. Because livestock can out-compete deer for preferred forage, causing deer to forage in areas containing vegetation of lower nutritional value (Crawford 1984, Jenks et al 1996, Stewart et al 2002, nutritional indicators may provide further evidence of negative effects of competitive interactions. Yet, despite substantial information that has accumulated on baseline levels of indices of nutritional condition, few studies have assessed effects of cattle stocking using nutritional information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavier mass of rumen digesta also was reported in mule deer with consumption of low-quality diets compared with high-quality diets (Baker and Hobbs 1987). Jenks et al (1994Jenks et al ( , 1996 reported reduced ruminal fill and greater intestinal fill in white-tailed deer on higher-quality diets compared with those occurring sympatrically with cattle that consumed a lower-quality diet. Our results supported those of Jenks et al (1994) for white-tailed deer; rumen digesta dry weights were greater in poorer-quality habitat (i.e., unburned habitat).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Most nutritional studies of ungulates have used fecal nitrogen (FN) content as an index of dietary quality because of the relationship between nitrogen and protein (Osborn & Jenks 1998). The concentration of nitrogen in feces has been correlated with dietary intake of nitrogen and has been used successfully to monitor dietary quality of black‐tailed deer ( O. hemionus columbianus ; Leslie & Starkey 1985), white‐tailed deer ( O. virginianus ; Howery & Pfister 1990; Jenks et al . 1996) and sika deer (Asada & Ochiai 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%