2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.92.042501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition of lattice and basis for alignment of nematic liquid crystals

Abstract: Due to elastic anisotropy, two-dimensional patterning of substrates can promote weak azimuthal alignment of adjacent nematic liquid crystals. Here, we consider how such alignment can be achieved using a periodic square lattice of circular or elliptical motifs. In particular, we examine ways in which the lattice and motif can compete to favor differing orientations. Using Monte Carlo simulation and continuum elasticity we find, for circular motifs, an orientational transition depending on the coverage fraction.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where β = 1/k B T and the z-axis has been chosen to be perpendicular to the substrates, located at z = z α 0 (α = 1, 2). According to equation (1), particles see each other as HGOs, but the substrates see a particle as an infinitely thin disc of diameter D (which need not be the same at both substrates, or in different regions of each substrate [38,39]). This is the oblate-particle version of the hard needle-wall potential of our earlier work [27][28][29][30]: physically, 0 < D < σ 0 means that the particles are able to embed their side-and end groups, but not the whole width of their cores, into the bounding walls.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where β = 1/k B T and the z-axis has been chosen to be perpendicular to the substrates, located at z = z α 0 (α = 1, 2). According to equation (1), particles see each other as HGOs, but the substrates see a particle as an infinitely thin disc of diameter D (which need not be the same at both substrates, or in different regions of each substrate [38,39]). This is the oblate-particle version of the hard needle-wall potential of our earlier work [27][28][29][30]: physically, 0 < D < σ 0 means that the particles are able to embed their side-and end groups, but not the whole width of their cores, into the bounding walls.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the center-to-center distance d ij is smaller than the contact distance σ ij , there is overlap. This criterion has been successfully implemented in other work [55][56][57][58]. If two ellipsoidal particles overlap, we exert the Gaussian model potential [59] V (u i , u j , d ij ) = 0 1 − χ 2 ( ûi…”
Section: Packing Algorithm For Ellipsoidal Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be either topographic, so that curvature is induced by the varying surface normal, or chemical, such that the preferred orientation axis varies across the substrate. In the absence of applied fields, surface coupling and orientational elasticity dominate LC alignment, such that varying a surface pattern can permit full control of both the preferred bulk orientation and its effective anchoring strength 34 . Incompatibility between the surface pattern and the ordering may also promote spontaneous symmetry breaking, in which the LC adopts a surface-region configuration belonging to a subgroup of the pattern’s symmetry group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%