2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition on the Nasdaq and the growth of electronic communication networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degryse, de Jong, and van Kervel (2011) There are a number of papers studying competition between traditional exchanges and ECNs in the U.S. Over the last decade, ECNs captured a significant fraction of trading volume, especially in Nasdaq-listed stocks. Findings support the view that competition between ECNs and Nasdaq market makers has significantly reduced quoted and effective spreads (Barclay, Christie, Harris, Kandel, and Schultz (1999), Weston (2000), and Fink, Fink, and Weston (2006)). Trades on ECNs seem to be more informative and contribute to price discovery (Huang (2002) and Barclay, Hendershott, and McCormick (2003)).…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Degryse, de Jong, and van Kervel (2011) There are a number of papers studying competition between traditional exchanges and ECNs in the U.S. Over the last decade, ECNs captured a significant fraction of trading volume, especially in Nasdaq-listed stocks. Findings support the view that competition between ECNs and Nasdaq market makers has significantly reduced quoted and effective spreads (Barclay, Christie, Harris, Kandel, and Schultz (1999), Weston (2000), and Fink, Fink, and Weston (2006)). Trades on ECNs seem to be more informative and contribute to price discovery (Huang (2002) and Barclay, Hendershott, and McCormick (2003)).…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Fink, Fink, and Weston (2006) study the growth of electronic communication networks (ECNs) in the U.S. equity market. They document that lower effective and relative bid-ask spreads, greater depths, and less concentrated markets are associated with the development of alternative trading platforms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, trading costs may decline and thereby improve market quality. Previous work suggests that competition improves market quality when electronic markets are able to compete (Weston (2002), Fink, Fink & Weston (2006)). For NYSE listings, the specialist had a competitive advantage preventing the electronic markets from directly competing for trades.…”
Section: Section 3: Testable Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%