2015
DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2015.1062075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition, strategic delegation and delay in technology adoption

Abstract: This paper examines how strategic managerial delegation affects firms' timing of adoption of a new technology under different modes of product market competition. It demonstrates that delegation has differential impacts on adoption dates under

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 In addition, the speed of the adoption of new technologies constitutes a fundamental determinant of economic growth. Given this, an extensive literature on the timing of technology adoption in the presence of strategic interactions has been developed (e.g., Reinganum, 1981a&b, 1983a&b (Cabral, 1990;Choi and Thum, 1998), information externalities (Chamley and Gale, 1994), strategic managerial delegation (Mahathi and Rupayan, 2013), and the mode and intensity of market competition (Milliou and Petrakis, 2011). However, the aforementioned literature has dealt exclusively with one-tier markets, that is, markets with in-house input production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In addition, the speed of the adoption of new technologies constitutes a fundamental determinant of economic growth. Given this, an extensive literature on the timing of technology adoption in the presence of strategic interactions has been developed (e.g., Reinganum, 1981a&b, 1983a&b (Cabral, 1990;Choi and Thum, 1998), information externalities (Chamley and Gale, 1994), strategic managerial delegation (Mahathi and Rupayan, 2013), and the mode and intensity of market competition (Milliou and Petrakis, 2011). However, the aforementioned literature has dealt exclusively with one-tier markets, that is, markets with in-house input production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of papers within this literature suggest that the differences in the speed of technology adoption across alternative markets can be explained by the differences in the markets' features, such as the presence of network externalities (Cabral, 1990;Choi & Thum, 1998), informational externalities (Chamley & Gale, 1994), strategic managerial delegation (Mahathi & Rupayan, 2013) or the mode and intensity of market competition (Milliou & Petrakis, 2011). Nevertheless, in contrast to us, all these papers have analyzed the firms' timing of technology adoption in one-tier industries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%