2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive ability of selected Cyclopia Vent. rhizobia under glasshouse and field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively low rooting percentage of C. genistoides shoots under in vitro conditions can be attributed to the absence of the specifi c rhizobium strains, the presence of which is often necessary for the proper root development in legume plants (Neves et al, 2001;Spriggs and Dakora, 2007). The fact that root induction was possible only in the case of shoots elongated for 60 d can be explained by the relatively long period of time necessary for the removal of exogenous cytokinins (in that case, 2iP and TDZ), the presence of which can effectively impair root formation (Zhao et al, 2003/4;Mundhara and Rashid, 2006;Husain et al, 2007).…”
Section: Root Induction and Plant Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively low rooting percentage of C. genistoides shoots under in vitro conditions can be attributed to the absence of the specifi c rhizobium strains, the presence of which is often necessary for the proper root development in legume plants (Neves et al, 2001;Spriggs and Dakora, 2007). The fact that root induction was possible only in the case of shoots elongated for 60 d can be explained by the relatively long period of time necessary for the removal of exogenous cytokinins (in that case, 2iP and TDZ), the presence of which can effectively impair root formation (Zhao et al, 2003/4;Mundhara and Rashid, 2006;Husain et al, 2007).…”
Section: Root Induction and Plant Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, manipulation of rhizobia microflora by inoculation may improve its distribution in the soil profile, leading to increased nodulation incidences of the more efficient rhizobium types. This is important as the effectiveness of indigenous or native populations of Rhizobium may be suboptimal resulting in a benefit from augmentation, as even the indigenous Rhizobium appeared to be more prolific than the inoculated rhizobium in the post establishment phase (Spriggs & Dakora, 2007). The constant removal of biomass at harvest results in the continuous depletion of the already nutrient-poor soil in the natural production areas of honeybush.…”
Section: Soil Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbiotic relationships of Cyclopia spp. With rhizobia may alleviate such stress conditions and even promote growth (Spriggs & Dakora, 2007, 2008). Spriggs and Dakora (2008) evaluated the efficacy of four rhizobia strains (PPRICI3, UCT40a, UCT44b, and UCT 61a) for their ability to stimulate growth in C. subternata and C .…”
Section: Cultivation Aspects Of Honeybushmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual propagation may be practised by farmers or the government but vegetative propagation is successful in terms of propagation and mass multiplication of Poplar. Vegetative propagation has become the preferred method of propagation to maintain individual characteristics, resulting in a genetically identical plant to the original donor plant (Araya 2005;Spriggs and Dakora 2007;Bester 2013). The growth regulators have successfully been used by many researchers to increase the growth of stem cuttings of plant species (Soundy et al, 2008;Singh et al 2011;Saǧlam et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%