Harnessing
the subsurface geologic environments in an efficient
and environmentally sustainable manner is challenged by uncertainties
associated with predicting the fate of fluids and sustaining porosity
and permeability in subsurface geologic environments. Some of these
uncertainties arise from confined and interfacially induced structures
of fluids in subsurface geologic environments. The formation of gas
hydrates, phase transitions of confined fluids, assembly and deposition
of heavy hydrocarbons, and the agglomeration and fate of nanoparticles
in confined environments are summarized in this review. Nanoscale
confinement contributes to anisotropic structures and dynamics of
fluids, which is the basis for anomalous phase transition thermodynamics,
reactivity, transport, and geomechanical behavior. In this review,
we discuss the structures of confined fluids and deviation in observed
properties from bulk fluids. The factors influencing the structures
of confined fluids can be generally divided into two groups: (a) pore
characteristics including pore size, pore surface chemistry, and pore
geometry and (b) confined fluid/solid characteristics such as molecular
structure, concentrations, charges, pore filling, and presence of
additives. Scientific advancements and knowledge gaps in our understanding
of the structures of confined fluids and the associated differences
in observed properties compared to bulk fluids are discussed. The
phenomena discussed in this review are of particular relevance to
our efforts in harnessing the subsurface environments for a low carbon
future by increasing the utilization of geothermal energy, using CO2 as a working fluid, and storing CO2 in subsurface
geologic environments.