2010
DOI: 10.2166/aqua.2010.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive adsorption of micropollutants and NOM onto activated carbon: comparison of different model approaches

Abstract: Conventional adsorption models are not able to describe exactly the competitive adsorption of natural organic matter (NOM) and micropollutants during drinking water treatment with activated carbon. This problem is a consequence of the complex structure of natural organic matter.In the last years, two user-oriented model approaches, the tracer model (TRM) and the equivalent background compound model (EBCM), were proposed to overcome the difficulties in modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be attributed to the comparably constant DOC concentrations, which influence competition for adsorption sites (Worch, 2010) and is in line with lab-scale adsorption experiments conducted with differing initial OMP concentrations under identical DOM background conditions (Matsui et al, 2003). The removals appear to be most steady at high PAC doses and for well-adsorbing OMPs.…”
Section: Micropollutantssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This can be attributed to the comparably constant DOC concentrations, which influence competition for adsorption sites (Worch, 2010) and is in line with lab-scale adsorption experiments conducted with differing initial OMP concentrations under identical DOM background conditions (Matsui et al, 2003). The removals appear to be most steady at high PAC doses and for well-adsorbing OMPs.…”
Section: Micropollutantssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…If the values of B and nT were determined, the CT/C0 value of the tracer from NOM bearing water could be calculated at any adsorbent mass, in contrast to the EBC model above. This model is in good agreement with the previous studies, and the advantages and limitations of SEBC model were given in previous literature [5,32,33].…”
Section: Modeling For Competing Nom Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Rather than focusing on the chemical distinctions among different NOM fractions, some researchers have used adsorption directly to characterize the fractions. In this approach, the NOM is represented as a mixture of several “fictive” components that compete for the available surface sites. The components are assigned adsorptive properties that, when considered in conjunction with a specific model for competitive adsorption, cause the overall NOM adsorption computed using the model to mimic the experimental findings, without ascribing any particular molecular properties to the different components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%