Competitive and cooperative dynamics of large-scale brain functional networks supporting recollection

Abstract

Analyses of functional interactions between large-scale brain networks have identified two broad systems that operate in apparent competition or antagonism with each other. One system, termed the default mode network (DMN), is thought to support internally oriented processing. The other system acts as a generic external attention system (EAS) and mediates attention to exogenous stimuli. Reports that the DMN and EAS show anticorrelated activity across a range of experimental paradigms suggest that competition between these systems supports adaptive behavior. Here, we used functional MRI to characterize functional interactions between the DMN and different EAS components during performance of a recollection task known to coactivate regions of both networks. Using methods to isolate task-related, context-dependent changes in functional connectivity between these systems, we show that increased cooperation between the DMN and a specific right-lateralized frontoparietal component of the EAS is associated with more rapid memory recollection. We also show that these cooperative dynamics are facilitated by a dynamic reconfiguration of the functional architecture of the DMN into core and transitional modules, with the latter serving to enhance integration with frontoparietal regions. In particular, the right posterior cingulate cortex may act as a critical information-processing hub that provokes these context-dependent reconfigurations from an intrinsic or default state of antagonism. Our findings highlight the dynamic, contextdependent nature of large-scale brain dynamics and shed light on their contribution to individual differences in behavior.complex | graph | modularity | rest | connectome I ncreasing evidence points to a fundamental distinction between two large-scale functional systems in the brain (1-4). One system, comprising regions of lateral prefrontal and parietal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate, and anterior insula/frontoopercular regions, typically shows increased activation during performance of challenging cognitive tasks and has been implicated in attentional and cognitive control functions (5, 6). It may thus be generally referred to as an external attention system (EAS), but it has also been labeled the task-positive and extrinsic network (3, 4). The other system, often called the default mode network (DMN), is localized primarily to midline posterior and anterior cortical regions, the angular gyri, and medial and lateral temporal cortices (7,8). It often shows decreased activity during tasks requiring attention to external stimuli (9, 10) and increased activity during unconstrained thought, introspection, and self-related processing (7, 11). The apparent antagonism between these two systems is mirrored in their spontaneous dynamics, which are often strongly anticorrelated (2). These competitive interactions are thought to promote adaptive and efficient alternation between DMN-dominated introspective thought and EAS-mediated processing of external stimuli (1-4).Several lines of evidence support thi...

Aging and large-scale functional networks: White matter integrity, gray matter volume, and functional connectivity in the resting state

“…Ageing has previously been associated with reduced neural activity, and we expected to find a similar reduction in resting state activity for older adults in each of the three large-scale networks (Hafkemeijer et al, 2012;Koch et al, 2010;Wu et relates directly to cognitive performance and aberrant processing (Chen et al, 2013;Fornito et al, 2012;. The lack of recruitment of FPN and SN in older adults might thus indicate that older adults do not switch between large-scale networks as readily and frequently as young adults do, which might contribute to their reduced cognitive performance.…”

Competition between frontoparietal control and default networks supports social working memory and empathy

“…Yet, in opposition to the FPC-DMN anti-correlation, the FPC showed more cooperation with the DAN as the task performance and task load increased. As previous literature has reported, the DMN is commonly associated with internally oriented and stimulus-independent mental processes, whereas the DAN is primarily involved in externally oriented visual attention (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002;Fornito et al, 2012). The FPC may be uniquely positioned to integrate information coming from the DMN and DAN by mediating competition between internally and externally directed processes (Vincent et al, 2008).…”

Memory Retrieval in Mice and Men

“…The set of processing components that interact to support a given task, for example, retrieval of an episodic memory, is denoted a "process-specific alliance," underlining the effect of transient interregional interactions on the contribution of individual brain regions to the task at hand. In the context of our discussion, this emphasizes the importance of understanding not only the role of each brain region in retrieval, but also how different regions interact to support distinct mnemonic functions, including retrieval (Simons and Spiers 2003;Mendelsohn et al 2010;Cabeza et al 2011;Huijbers et al 2011;St Jacques et al 2011;Fornito et al 2012;Watrous et al 2013). Further, the notion that the same region could also be involved in nonmnemonic tasks, may at times blur the distinction between brain signatures of…”