2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02335.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive exclusion along climate gradients: energy efficiency influences the distribution of two salmonid fishes

Abstract: We tested the importance of thermal adaptations and energy efficiency in relation to the geographical distribution of two competing freshwater salmonid fish species. Presence-absence data for Arctic char and brown trout were obtained from 1502 Norwegian lakes embracing both temperature and productivity gradients. The distributions were contrasted with laboratory-derived temperature scaling models for food consumption, growth and energy efficiency. Thermal performances of the two species were almost identical. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
113
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
113
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although temperature exerts pronounced effects on physical processes in poikilotherms (e.g., Wootton 1998), we found no implications suggesting that water temperature modified the effect of presence of Arctic char on brown trout food consumption. This corresponds to previous findings of only minor difference in thermal performance between Arctic char and brown trout (Larsson 2005;Forseth et al 2009;Elliott and Elliott 2010;Finstad et al 2011). Change in temperature per se is therefore not likely to alter the competitive outcome between Arctic char and brown trout directly through water temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although temperature exerts pronounced effects on physical processes in poikilotherms (e.g., Wootton 1998), we found no implications suggesting that water temperature modified the effect of presence of Arctic char on brown trout food consumption. This corresponds to previous findings of only minor difference in thermal performance between Arctic char and brown trout (Larsson 2005;Forseth et al 2009;Elliott and Elliott 2010;Finstad et al 2011). Change in temperature per se is therefore not likely to alter the competitive outcome between Arctic char and brown trout directly through water temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In winter, however, competitive dominance may shift as charr are better adapted than trout to feed on zoobenthos under cold and dark conditions (Hammar, 1998;Elliott, 2011;. Correspondingly, charr have also been observed outcompeting trout in cold, ultraoligotrophic lakes situated at high altitudes and latitudes Finstad et al, 2011). Nevertheless, our findings show that, at least in some subarctic lakes, charr and trout can coexist in the littoral zone in the summer.…”
Section: Interspecific Niche Segregation Between Charr and Troutmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Finstad et al 2011;Helland et al 2011;Ulvan et al 2012). This will be exacerbated by the difficulties that winter specialists will face in dealing with the epilimnetic summer warming that will accompany shorter winters (Pörtner 2006;Somero 2010).…”
Section: Sensitivity To Climate Change Is Shaped By Winter Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%