Competitive hierarchies among three species of juvenile coral reef fishes

Abstract

Interspecific competition is often asymmetric, and it can limit the spatial distributions of competitively inferior species within a community. When asymmetric competition involves 2 or more component species, the ranking of species' competitive abilities may form competitive hierarchies (all species of higher rank out-compete all species of lower rank) or competitive networks (at least 1 species of lower rank out-competes ≥1 species of higher rank). Expectations of resource monopolization and patterns of distribution and abundance among species in competitive networks are expected to differ from those in competitive hierarchies. We conducted a field experiment to evaluate the relative competitive abilities of juveniles of 3 closely related species of reef fish (bird wrasse Gomphosus varius, fivestripe wrasse Thalassoma quinquevittatum and the sixbar wrasse T. hardwicke) on Moorea, French Polynesia. We controlled for intrinsic variation in survivorship among species and found that competition among these 3 species was highly asymmetric, resulting in a simple competitive hierarchy (sequence of competitive ability from superior to inferior competitors): fivestripe wrasse > bird wrasse > sixbar wrasse. We surveyed densities of the 3 reef fish species on 55 patch reefs and observed significant negative spatial covariation between superior and inferior competitors, consistent with competitive hierarchies that limit the spatial distributions of the inferior species (sixbar wrasse). Our work demonstrates that intense asymmetric competition and the formation of competitive hierarchies may be an important determinant of resource monopolization and patterns of distribution and abundance in reef fishes.KEY WORDS: Asymmetric competition · Competitive hierarchies · Interspecific interactions · Wrasse · Gomphosus · Thalassoma · French Polynesia Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher Editorial responsibility: Tim McClanahan,

Linking animal contests and community structure using rockpool fishes as a model system

“…A range of mechanisms have been proposed to explain coexistence of superior and inferior competitors, including competition colonisation trade-offs (Tilman 1994), the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (Connell 1978;Sousa 1979), microhabitat partitioning (Denno, Mcclure & Ott 1995) and complex behaviours generating the formation of hierarchies among species (e.g. Geange, Adrian & Jeffrey 2013). One behavioural mechanism by which individuals compete over limiting resources and generate such species hierarchies is via aggressive contests (Smith & Price 1973;Austad 1989).…”

Scaling patterns inform ontogenetic transitions away from cleaning in Thalassoma wrasses

“…As each facultative cleaner wrasse in our study overlaps in habitat with other Thalassoma (in addition to other wrasses), juveniles of each of these species compete for prey directly with saturated assemblages of adult conspecifics and congeners. Geange et al (Geange et al, 2013) show that even among juvenile non-cleaner taxa in this clade, intense asymmetric competition between congeners can arise within areas of high density. Our results suggest that cleaning behavior may present a mechanism by which such competition is reduced by providing juvenile facultative cleaner species an alternate source of prey.…”

“…We suggest that these reduced suites of mechanical features -low maxillary KT, small gape and low bite force -in Thalassoma wrasses may have evolved as a result of competitive displacement. Thalassoma wrasses co-occur, often in great abundance, in many tropical regions including but not limited to the Indian Ocean, the Indo-Pacific and the Caribbean (Randall et al, 1997;Geange, 2010;Geange et al, 2013;Froese and Pauly, 2014). In fact, field surveys conducted in the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean found that reef crests were typically numerically dominated by members of this clade (Bellwood et al, 2002).…”

Reproductive phenology across the lunar cycle: parental decisions, offspring responses, and consequences for reef fish

“…Larvae may be able to delay maturation to avoid settling during brighter periods of the lunar cycle and/or target predictably darker periods (Shima et al 2018) when the effectiveness of nocturnal reef-based predators may be curtailed (Acosta and Butler 1999). Postsettlement mortality of young sixbars is strongly density dependent (Shima 2001b, Shima andOsenberg 2003), and is further mediated by priority effects (Geange and Stier 2009), as well as by interactions with other species (Shima 2001a, Shima et al 2006, 2008, Geange et al 2013.…”