1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1536(83)80019-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive interactions amongst four species of Glomus on maize and onion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the present study, the isolates G11-CN, G14-CN, and Am-R also exerted strong effects on growth, irrespective of the growth conditions. These results corroborate those found by Daft and Hogarth (1983) and Edathil et al (1996), indicating that the maximum benefits for growth can be achieved using a single and efficient AMF species and that isolate mixtures composed of a high diversity of species do not necessarily translate into increased benefits to plants.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the present study, the isolates G11-CN, G14-CN, and Am-R also exerted strong effects on growth, irrespective of the growth conditions. These results corroborate those found by Daft and Hogarth (1983) and Edathil et al (1996), indicating that the maximum benefits for growth can be achieved using a single and efficient AMF species and that isolate mixtures composed of a high diversity of species do not necessarily translate into increased benefits to plants.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thonar et al (2011) observed distinct spatial efficiencies in P uptake by Rhizophagus intraradices, Claroideoglomus claroideum, and Gigaspora margarita, which help to explain the empirical evidence that root colonization by multiple AMF species may be more beneficial to plants than colonization by a single species (Jansa et al 2008). However, there is evidence that most of the benefits to host plants could be achieved using a single species, provided that the species is efficient and adapted (Daft andHogarth 1983, Edathil et al 1996). Therefore, a high taxonomic diversity of AMF species in a particular system would not necessarily result in increased benefits to the host plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desta forma, experimentos que envolvam mais do que um isolado fúngico em um único hospedeiro refletirão, provavelmente, melhor os processos que ocorrem naturalmente. Competição interespecífica tem sido medida como uma função de esporulação diferenciada por parte desses fungos (Daft, 1983;Daft & Hogarth, 1983) e pela formação de pontos de entrada em raízes sendo colonizadas (Wilson, 1984). Apesar dessas interações, uma mistura de isolados fúngicos tem demonstrado prover um benefício no crescimento maior do que isolados fúngicos colonizando as raízes sozinhos (Daft, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Our data on spore production were comparable to those obtained by Giovannetti et al (1988) by using Glomus monosporum with Allium cepa and Trifolium pratense as host plants (0.6-3.7 spores/g of soil) and by Moreira et al (2007) by using diverse AM fungi in symbiosis with different host plants (0.2-1.5 spores/g of soil). Differences in AM fungal sporulation have been reported by several authors when different plants were used as hosts, both in laboratory (Daft and Hogarth, 1983;Hetrick and Bloom, 1986;Koomen et al, 1987;Hung and Sylvia, 1988;Bever et al, 1996;Carrenho et al, 2002) and in field conditions (Black and Tinker, 1979;Schenck and Kinloch, 1980;McGraw and Hendrix, 1984;Moreira et al, 2007). Moreover, sporulation was significantly affected by harvest time (Bever et al, 1996), season (Fowler and Antonovics, 1981;Gemma et al, 1989;Bentivenga and Hetrick, 1991;Hetrick et al, 1994), edaphic factors (Gilden and Tinker, 1981;Stahl and Smith, 1984;Louis and Lim, 1988;Boerner, 1990;Stahl et al, 1990;Stahl and Christensen, 1991), and AM fungal geographic origin (Fox and Morrow, 1981;Burdon, 1987).…”
Section: Greenhouse Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 84%