2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive Interactions of π–π Junctions and Their Role on Microphase Separation of Chiral Block Copolymers

Abstract: Herein, enantiomeric polylactide-containing chiral block copolymers (BCPs*) with aliphatic and aromatic junctions are designed and synthesized for investigating the impact of junction π–π interactions on the self-assembly of BCPs*. A profound effect on the microphase separation of the BCP* can be found by introducing the π–π interaction of junctions, resulting in reduced structural ordering due to the mixing of constituted blocks by the formation of junction π-stacking. An ordered microphase-separated structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…investigated the competitive interactions of π  π junctions between the chiral PLA and achiral PS blocks, and their roles on microphase‐separation behaviors. [ 38 ] They indicated that the formation of π  π stacking based on π  π junctions would reduce the structural ordering due to the mixing of constituent blocks. However, ordered morphologies were easily obtained in BCs containing alkyl junctions where no π  π stacking could occur, thus indicating the competitive interactions of π  π junctions and the microphase separation of chiral BCs.…”
Section: Hierarchical Chirality Transfer In Condensed Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…investigated the competitive interactions of π  π junctions between the chiral PLA and achiral PS blocks, and their roles on microphase‐separation behaviors. [ 38 ] They indicated that the formation of π  π stacking based on π  π junctions would reduce the structural ordering due to the mixing of constituent blocks. However, ordered morphologies were easily obtained in BCs containing alkyl junctions where no π  π stacking could occur, thus indicating the competitive interactions of π  π junctions and the microphase separation of chiral BCs.…”
Section: Hierarchical Chirality Transfer In Condensed Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] Mechanism insights indicate that the formation of chiral surperstructures are kinetically-dependent and affected by the complex interplays among multiple interactions including chirality, hydrophibic interaction, and crystallization; however, the details of which are still inadequately understood. [13][14][15] Physiological processes and biological reactions prefer to carry out in nanoconfinement space where the spatial confinement plays significant roles in the proceeding of sophisticated biochemical reactions. [16][17][18] For example, spatial DNA confinement in vivo promotes the formation of localized defects at mechanically weak sites which are vital for biological regulatory functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase behavior of BCPs can be affected by some specific intermolecular interactions, [ 22 ] such as H‐bonding, [ 23–26 ] π – π stacking, [ 27–30 ] metal/ion–dipole interactions, [ 31–34 ] and electrostatic interactions. [ 35–43 ] Among them, the BCPs possessing long‐range electrostatic forces achieved by the complexation between metal ions and polymer chains have received extensive attention due to the promising prospect in solid‐state electrolytes, and understanding the phase behavior of these charge‐containing BCPs has important implications for structure‐properties design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%