2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive Ligand Exchange and Dissociation in Ru Indenyl Complexes

Abstract: Kinetic profiles obtained from monitoring the solution phase substitution chemistry of [Ru(η 5 -indenyl)(NCPh)(PPh 3 ) 2 ] + (1) by both ESI-MS and 31 P{ 1 H} NMR are essentially identical, despite an

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequences of these differences can be rigorously examined through numerical simulation of the various competing processes using the COPASI software, [35,36] subject to certain simplifying assumptions. The first of these is that any process involving monomeric Me 2 AlX (X = Me or OH) forming a dimeric species or a tetrahedral intermediate (e. g. Me 3 Al-OH 2 ) is essentially diffusion controlled, but possibly reversible, while methane elimination from various species is chemically controlled but irreversible.…”
Section: Initial Hydrolysis Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of these differences can be rigorously examined through numerical simulation of the various competing processes using the COPASI software, [35,36] subject to certain simplifying assumptions. The first of these is that any process involving monomeric Me 2 AlX (X = Me or OH) forming a dimeric species or a tetrahedral intermediate (e. g. Me 3 Al-OH 2 ) is essentially diffusion controlled, but possibly reversible, while methane elimination from various species is chemically controlled but irreversible.…”
Section: Initial Hydrolysis Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, dissociation of an X‐type ligand from a positively charged ion would require charge separation and solvent stabilization and will therefore not occur during MS/MS (in the negative ion mode dissociation of an X‐type ligand is possible (eg, [PtCl 4 ] 2− → [PtCl 3 ] − + Cl − ). The absence of solvent interactions also makes C‐H activation processes such as orthometallation common in the gas phase and makes dissociation of chelating ligands highly unlikely. In general, processes involving highly polarized transition states will be disfavored.…”
Section: The Fundamentals Of Assigning Esi‐ms Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSI‐ESI‐MS has also proven useful for Belli et al. in comparing the affinity of select secondary and tertiary phosphines for cationic ruthenium centers [81] . Competitive substitution reactions were analyzed in real time to assess the relative binding strength and measure the relative kinetics.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSI-ESI-MS has also proven useful for Belli et al in comparing the affinity of select secondary and tertiary phosphines for cationic ruthenium centers. [81] Competitive substitution reactions were analyzed in real time to assess the relative binding strength and measure the relative kinetics. A dissociative mechanism for substitution of NCPh with secondary phosphines on [Ru(η 5 -indenyl)(NCPh)(PPh 3 ) 2 ] + was revealed, as well as reaction kinetics.…”
Section: Applications In Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%