2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-s11-s4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists

Abstract: BackgroundEndocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are exogenous compounds that interfere with the endocrine system of vertebrates, often through direct or indirect interactions with nuclear receptor proteins. Estrogen receptors (ERs) are particularly important protein targets and many EDCs are ER binders, capable of altering normal homeostatic transcription and signaling pathways. An estrogenic xenobiotic can bind ER as either an agonist or antagonist to increase or inhibit transcription, respectively. The recep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(84 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, ZEN and metabolites were selected as a case study since they are structurally and biologically very similar (EFSA, 2011;WHO, 2000). Also, several works already pointed toward the feasibility of modeling the estrogenic activity of ligands through the evaluation of interaction with ER-LBD in silico (McRobb et al, 2014;Ng et al, 2014b). In the first step, available experimental data were reviewed to identify the most relevant endpoint to be used for the formation/characterization of a ZEN analog group.…”
Section: Tab 2: Computed Results Of Zen and Reduced Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, ZEN and metabolites were selected as a case study since they are structurally and biologically very similar (EFSA, 2011;WHO, 2000). Also, several works already pointed toward the feasibility of modeling the estrogenic activity of ligands through the evaluation of interaction with ER-LBD in silico (McRobb et al, 2014;Ng et al, 2014b). In the first step, available experimental data were reviewed to identify the most relevant endpoint to be used for the formation/characterization of a ZEN analog group.…”
Section: Tab 2: Computed Results Of Zen and Reduced Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This QSAR model consists of two separate docking models (SDMs), one constructed using known agonists and the other was built from known antagonists [16]. Figure 8 shows the study design.…”
Section: Docking Models For Predicting Er Agonists and Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the end of last century, the advancement in computer technology and the generation of a huge amount of scientific data [5,6] progressed the field of QSAR to a new height. A lot of QSAR methods have been developed and applied by the scientific research community and in regulatory sciences [7][8][9][10], e.g., pharmacophore modeling [11][12][13][14][15], molecular docking [16][17][18][19], CoMFA [19], classification tree model [20], decision forest [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and support vector machine [28], to name a few.…”
Section: Brief History Of Qsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of these applications is impressive, considering their applicability in risk assessment on potential EDCs, but also for the identification of potential agonists and antagonists in drug discovery projects. [233] Alternariol and alternariol methyl ether, produced by different Alternaria species, have been recognized as another set of emerging micotoxins. In silico docking, scoring and re-scoring strategies were applied to investigate first whether these molecules could generate genotoxic effects by the activation of DNA topoisomerase I and/or II [229].…”
Section: Docking and Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%