2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.110663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive neurocognitive processes following bereavement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical theories of grief include: the “Five Stages” model, describing a sequence of emotional states (Kübler-Ross & Byock, 1969); attachment theory-based descriptions of painful bond breaking (Bowlby, 1979); and the “Dual Process” model, describing oscillation between loss processing and restoration (Schut, 1999). More recently, models informed by neurobiology and/or behavioural neuroscience have suggested that learning (O’connor & Seeley, 2022; Boddez, 2018), representational change (Shear & Shair, 2005), competitive (Békés, Roberts, & Németh, 2023) and cognitive-behavioral (Maccallum & Bryant, 2013) processes play central roles in grief, and may have identifiable neural correlates (Gündel, O’Connor, Littrell, Fort, & Lane, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical theories of grief include: the “Five Stages” model, describing a sequence of emotional states (Kübler-Ross & Byock, 1969); attachment theory-based descriptions of painful bond breaking (Bowlby, 1979); and the “Dual Process” model, describing oscillation between loss processing and restoration (Schut, 1999). More recently, models informed by neurobiology and/or behavioural neuroscience have suggested that learning (O’connor & Seeley, 2022; Boddez, 2018), representational change (Shear & Shair, 2005), competitive (Békés, Roberts, & Németh, 2023) and cognitive-behavioral (Maccallum & Bryant, 2013) processes play central roles in grief, and may have identifiable neural correlates (Gündel, O’Connor, Littrell, Fort, & Lane, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%