2013
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive Price-Matching Guarantees: Equilibrium Analysis of the Availability Verification Clause Under Demand Uncertainty

Abstract: Price-matching guarantees involve a retailer matching the lower price of a competitor for an identical product. In reality, retailers often make such guarantees contingent on the verification of product availability at the competitor's location, and decline a price-match request if the product is not available there. This creates certain consternation on the part of customers. In this paper, we investigate the availability contingency strategy from the perspectives of both the retailers and the customers. Our … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yuxin Chen et al (2001) were among the first to characterize two fundamental features of a price-matching-guarantee contract (i.e., a competition-dampening effect and a competitionenhancing effect). The subsequent literature extended their model by addressing more novel research questions, such as the consumer's postpurchase search decision (e.g., Jiang et al, 2017), the consumer's bounded rationality (e.g., T. Huang et al, 2017), and verification of product availability (e.g., Nalca et al, 2013). The other contracts (i.e., rebate contract, buyback contract, and revenue-sharing contract) are commonly observed within the distribution channel.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuxin Chen et al (2001) were among the first to characterize two fundamental features of a price-matching-guarantee contract (i.e., a competition-dampening effect and a competitionenhancing effect). The subsequent literature extended their model by addressing more novel research questions, such as the consumer's postpurchase search decision (e.g., Jiang et al, 2017), the consumer's bounded rationality (e.g., T. Huang et al, 2017), and verification of product availability (e.g., Nalca et al, 2013). The other contracts (i.e., rebate contract, buyback contract, and revenue-sharing contract) are commonly observed within the distribution channel.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of the former include store-level pricing (Chintagunta et al , 2003; Khan and Jain, 2005; Montgomery, 1997), demographic-based pricing (Frank et al , 2014; Gary-Bobo and Larribeau, 2004), motivation-based pricing (Lee et al , 2013), lifestyle-based pricing (Bruwer and Li, 2017), knowledge-based pricing (Barrutia and Espinosa, 2014), targeted advertising/promotion (Esteves and Resende, 2016; Sayman and Hoch, 2014), behavior-based price discrimination (Caillaud and De Nijs, 2014; Conitzer et al , 2012; Shin and Sudhir, 2010) and situational/contextual price discrimination (Wakefield and Inman, 2003). Examples for the latter include the use of warranties (Soberman, 2003; Chu and Chintagunta, 2011), quantity discounts (Khan and Jain, 2005; Cohen, 2008; Subramaniam and Gal-Or, 2009), multi-period pricing (Geng et al , 2007), coupons (Anderson and Song, 2004; Dhar and Hoch, 1996; Narasimhan, 1984; Shaffer and Zhang, 1995), price promotions (Empen et al , 2015), price matching/price difference refund policies (Jain and Srivastava, 2000; Nalca et al , 2010; Nalca et al , 2013), bonus buys (Dhar and Hoch, 1996; Cui et al , 2008), rebates (Chen et al , 2005; Lu and Moorthy, 2007), probabilistic product offerings (Fay et al , 2015), metering (Gil and Hartmann, 2009) and multiple shipping options (Li and Dinlersoz, 2012).…”
Section: Conceptual Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, a detailed look at the fine print of PMGs reveals conditions such as the rival needing to be an authorized dealer, the stock keeping unit (SKU) of the product must be the same, and the product must be available in stock. Consequently, there has been interest in the Production and Operations Management operations management literature to investigate the impact of these conditions (Nalca et al, 2010(Nalca et al, , 2013(Nalca et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%