2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compilation and interpretation of photochemical model performance statistics published between 2006 and 2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
132
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
18
132
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have also found the CMAQ to predict ozone mixing ratios that were biased high (Eder et al, 2009;Tang et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2012a, b;Wilczak et al, 2006). Simon et al (2012) completed an exhaustive comparison of photochemical performance statistics reported from 2006 to 2012, whereby national median in mean bias for hourly ozone was approximately 4 ppb; for 1 h maximum ozone it was approximately 8 ppb (Simon et al, 2012). In comparison, the bias determined in this study would be higher than the 75th percentile of studies of hourly ozone mean bias for the 40 studies compiled by Simon et al (2012).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ferry Ozone With Cmaq Experimental Model Forecmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others have also found the CMAQ to predict ozone mixing ratios that were biased high (Eder et al, 2009;Tang et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2012a, b;Wilczak et al, 2006). Simon et al (2012) completed an exhaustive comparison of photochemical performance statistics reported from 2006 to 2012, whereby national median in mean bias for hourly ozone was approximately 4 ppb; for 1 h maximum ozone it was approximately 8 ppb (Simon et al, 2012). In comparison, the bias determined in this study would be higher than the 75th percentile of studies of hourly ozone mean bias for the 40 studies compiled by Simon et al (2012).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ferry Ozone With Cmaq Experimental Model Forecmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Simon et al (2012) completed an exhaustive comparison of photochemical performance statistics reported from 2006 to 2012, whereby national median in mean bias for hourly ozone was approximately 4 ppb; for 1 h maximum ozone it was approximately 8 ppb (Simon et al, 2012). In comparison, the bias determined in this study would be higher than the 75th percentile of studies of hourly ozone mean bias for the 40 studies compiled by Simon et al (2012). The work presented here represents the first study of CMAQ model bias over the water of Lake Michigan and shows a higher bias than over the surrounding land.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ferry Ozone With Cmaq Experimental Model Forecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…emission rates) of sources elsewhere (ENVIRON, 2005b;Castell et al, 2010;ENVIRON, 2012a;Kelly et al, 2015; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2015). Measurements of O 3 enhancements made as part of in-plume aircraft transects for very large single sources of NO X (Luria et al, 2003;Springston et al, 2005) show similar impacts as those in Fig. 5 although direct comparability is cautioned since it is not clear that the in-plume measurements captured downwind peak O 3 levels from these sources.…”
Section: O 3 Impacts From Single Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A large body of work exists using photochemical transport models to estimate the aggregate effect of regional emissions on downwind ozone and PM 2.5 air quality (Simon et al, 2012). However, few studies examine the effects of single sources.…”
Section: Review Of Existing Single Source Impact Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation