2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2004.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compilation and R-matrix analysis of Big Bang nuclear reaction rates

Abstract: We use the R-matrix theory to fit low-energy data on nuclear reactions involved in Big Bang nucleosynthesis. A special attention is paid to the rate uncertainties which are evaluated on statistical grounds. We provide S factors and reaction rates in tabular and graphical formats.Comment: 40 pages, accepted for publication at ADNDT, web site at http://pntpm3.ulb.ac.be/bigban

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
389
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(421 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
26
389
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Refs. [63,64]). The uncertainties quoted in Tables VIII, IX, and X of Appendix A approximate a 1σ (∼68.3 percent) confidence level for a multiple parameter fit.…”
Section: A Parameter Uncertainties and Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [63,64]). The uncertainties quoted in Tables VIII, IX, and X of Appendix A approximate a 1σ (∼68.3 percent) confidence level for a multiple parameter fit.…”
Section: A Parameter Uncertainties and Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent Planck result [4] for the baryon density, Ω B h 2 = 0.02226 ± 0.00016, corresponds to a baryon-to-photon ratio of η = (6.10 ± 0.04) × 10 −10 . Because the uncertainty in η is now less than 1%, standard big bang nucleosynthesis (SBBN) [5][6][7] is a parameter-free theory [8], and relatively precise predictions of the primordial abundances of the light elements D, 3 He, 4 He, and 7 Li are available [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. While the 7 Li abundance remains problematic [17], recent D/H determinations from quasar absorption systems have become quite precise, in their own right, and they are in excellent agreement with the prediction from SBBN and the CMB [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 (normalized to the Marcucci et al (2005) theoretical S -factor). It shows that previous fits [27][28][29] were driven down by the scarce data at BBN energies. This is not the case anymore when the theoretical energy dependence of Marcucci et al (2005) is assumed.…”
Section: LI and D Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2. Ratio of experimental [22][23][24][25], fitted [5,[27][28][29] and new theoretical [30] S -factors to the theoretical one [20]; the horizontal lines correspond to the theoretical S -factor scaled by α ± ∆α [5]. (Systematic uncertainties in the range 4.5-9% are not shown.…”
Section: LI and D Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%