1992
DOI: 10.2172/7045508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compilation of Sandia coal char combustion data and kinetic analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data support a value of p near 0.25. The corresponding value for a is 0.25, a value consistent with those previously determined (Mitchell et al, 1991 andSmith, 1971). …”
Section: Measured Changes In Particle Size Distributions During Combusupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data support a value of p near 0.25. The corresponding value for a is 0.25, a value consistent with those previously determined (Mitchell et al, 1991 andSmith, 1971). …”
Section: Measured Changes In Particle Size Distributions During Combusupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The set of 100 differential equations were solved using LSODE (Radhakrishnan and Hindmarsh, 1983), an ordinary differential equation solver. Ambient conditions were specified (Tg, = 1500 K, Pg = 0.12 am), and char combustion model parameters were taken from the literature (Mitchell et aL, 1991 andMitchell, 1992). The apparent activation energy was taken as 26 kcal/mol, consistent with results of previous work (Hurt and Mitchell, 1992) for chars containing 90% carbon.…”
Section: Characterization Of Fragmentation During Char Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous work (Mitchell, et al, 1992), this method is accurate to better than 10%. The measurements indicate that 25% of the initial char mass remained (Le., m/mo = 0.25) at the 117 ms residence time in the flow reactor.…”
Section: Task 3: Char Fragmentation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Figure 58 and compared to the results from Eqs. (70) Figure 59. Equation (73) shows qualitative agreement at best with Eqs.…”
Section: Particle Diameter @M)mentioning
confidence: 99%