2009
DOI: 10.1587/transele.e92.c.1284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compiler Framework for Reconfigurable Computing Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexity of 1-d jacobi and matrix multiplication optimized by different approaches is given in Table 4. Table 4 shows the complexity of our approach is acceptable in in the case of 1-d Jacobi and matrix multiplication even though that the execution time is slightly longer than that of DFG based scheme [8]. In addition, we find that the runtime of optimization is closely related to the number of dependence reference because more dependence give rise to more inequality constraints in the PIP problem [15].…”
Section: Run-time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The complexity of 1-d jacobi and matrix multiplication optimized by different approaches is given in Table 4. Table 4 shows the complexity of our approach is acceptable in in the case of 1-d Jacobi and matrix multiplication even though that the execution time is slightly longer than that of DFG based scheme [8]. In addition, we find that the runtime of optimization is closely related to the number of dependence reference because more dependence give rise to more inequality constraints in the PIP problem [15].…”
Section: Run-time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At first, Some notations used in performance evaluation are described in Table 1. The comparison of the same affine loop nests program mapped with DFG-based optimization approach [8] and our proposed front-end source code based optimization algo- plate extraction and template matching) are used on the generated DFG in the executable synthesis to reduce the reconfiguration cost. On the other hand, optimization opportunity is directly exploited from the front-end source code using Polyhedral Model in our proposed approach.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Polyhedral Optimizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, one MB can be decoded in every 800 cycles, thereby achieving a decoding performance of 30 fps (frame per second) given the target working frequency of 200 MHz with 8160 MBs to be processed in one high-definition frame (i.e., 200 × 10 6 /(8160 × 30)). Algorithm partitioning (into parallel tasks) is performed by manually inserting directives in the source code, whereas task mapping, scheduling and memory allocation are automatically performed by a compiler tool [11] we developed. …”
Section: Multi-mode Buffer Memory Structurementioning
confidence: 99%