Complaint risk among mental health practitioners compared with physical health practitioners: a retrospective cohort study of complaints to health regulators in Australia

Abstract

Objectives To understand complaint risk among mental health practitioners compared with physical health practitioners. Design Retrospective cohort study, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) to analyse complaint risk and a multivariate regression model to identify predictors of complaints. Setting National study using complaints data from health regulators in Australia. Participants All psychiatrists and psychologists ('mental health practitioners') and all physicians, optometrists, physiotherapists, osteopaths and chiropractors ('physical health practitioners') registered to practice in Australia between 2011 and 2016. Outcome measures Incidence rates, source and nature of complaints to regulators. Results In total, 7903 complaints were lodged with regulators over the 6-year period. Most complaints were lodged by patients and their families. Mental health practitioners had a complaint rate that was more than twice that of physical health practitioners (complaints per 1000 practice years: psychiatrists 119.1 vs physicians 48.0, p<0.001; psychologists 21.9 vs other allied health 7.5, p<0.001). Their risk of complaints was especially high in relation to reports, records, confidentiality, interpersonal behaviour, sexual boundary breaches and the mental health of the practitioner. Among mental health practitioners, male practitioners (psychiatrists IRR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.85; psychologists IRR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.07) and older practitioners (≥65 years compared with 36-45 years: psychiatrists IRR 2.37, 95% CI 1.95 to 2.89; psychologists IRR 1.78, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.14) were at increased risk of complaints. Conclusions Mental health practitioners were more likely to be the subject of complaints than physical health practitioners. Areas of increased risk are related to professional ethics, communication skills and the health of mental health practitioners themselves. Further research could usefully explore whether addressing these risk factors through training, professional development and practitioner health initiatives may reduce the risk of complaints about mental health practitioners.

Criminal and financial penalties for clinicians in the ACT Mental Health Act weigh more heavily on senior doctors

“…Another explanation for this finding could be that the sense of ultimate responsibility for utilising the Act falls to the senior psychiatrist. Mental health practitioners are at an increased risk of complaints compared to physical health practitioners in Australia, 7 and so senior doctors may have had more time to accrue personal experiences of criticism of their practice or decision making from consumers, managers, or regulatory authorities.…”

“…[4][5][6] However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal design of mental health services to meet the needs of people with ID. 7 To address this, our team undertook a scoping study of the need for an adult tertiary IDMH service in New South Wales (NSW). We have previously described findings from a survey of family members and support persons of people with ID.…”

Understanding Risk Factors for Complaints Against Pharmacists: A Content Analysis

“…A small percentage of practitioners account for up to 50% of claims, and their likelihood of being claimed is associated with specific demographic or practice characteristics. [6][7][8][9][10] Identifying these risk areas of health care complaints provides regulatory agencies, professional bodies, and educational institutions with invaluable opportunities to proactively address negative trends by allocating resources to targeted preventative strategies. 11 Pharmacists play a vital role in elevating the quality of healthcare and safeguarding the wellbeing of the public.…”

How many more people will be abused before we act on sexual violence in healthcare?

“…Perpetrators are found to use specific career choices such as agency or locum work to improve their access to targets 10. Some workplaces, notably mental health facilities, are hotspots for perpetrators as they are the location of a wide range of professions including psychiatry, nursing, and psychology staff 111213. There are also issues with family medicine14 and obstetrics and gynaecology,15 although these vary by profession and access.…”