2012
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary explanation of temperature response in the lower atmosphere

Abstract: There are a number of asymmetries in the surface air temperature response to forcing, including polar amplification and changes to the diurnal and seasonal temperature ranges. We propose that such spatial-temporal signatures of climate change can, in part, be explained by differences in the effective heat capacity of the atmosphere. We have demonstrated that predictions arising from this hypothesis are simultaneously satisfied through the analysis of temperature records from daily to inter-decadal timescales u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Summertime surface air temperatures increased only weakly in central and southern NWS (Shulgina et al, 2011;Ippolitov et al, 2014) likely being damped by increasing cloud cover (Tang and Leng, 2012;Esau et al, 2012). The temperature trends in the winter months were negative (Cohen et al, 2012;Outten and Esau, 2011;Outten et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summertime surface air temperatures increased only weakly in central and southern NWS (Shulgina et al, 2011;Ippolitov et al, 2014) likely being damped by increasing cloud cover (Tang and Leng, 2012;Esau et al, 2012). The temperature trends in the winter months were negative (Cohen et al, 2012;Outten and Esau, 2011;Outten et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certain heat input results in a larger temperature increase in a shallow than in a deep ABL. As the ABL is typically shallow in the Arctic, this may have contributed to the Arctic amplification of climate warming (Esau and Zilitinkevich, 2010;Esau et al, 2012). It is, however, not a positive feedback, as heating of the ABL tends to increase its thickness.…”
Section: Feedback Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under recent climate conditions, melt ponds predominantly develop in the continental shelf regions and in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Use of melt pond parameterizations, compared to classical albedo formulations with either no or only very simplistic recognition of melt ponds, lead to systematically reduced albedos, enhanced sea ice melt, reduced summer ice thickness and concentration (Karlsson and Svensson, 2013;Roeckner et al, 2012;Flocco et al, 2012) and contribute about 1 W m −2 to the forcing of ice melt .…”
Section: Snow and Freezing/melting Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also partly explain the fact that the Arctic warming has been larger in winter than summer (e.g. Walsh et al, 2011) and that global warming has been larger during the night than during the day (Graversen and Wang, 2009;Esau et al, 2012). The stronger near-surface cooling of the Arctic compared to global temperatures during 1940-1970(Chylek et al, 2009) may also have been affected by the smaller heat capacity of the thin ABL in the Arctic.…”
Section: Vertical Profile Of Arctic Warmingmentioning
confidence: 99%