2017
DOI: 10.1101/213157
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary metrics of human auditory nerve function derived from compound action potentials

Abstract: Declines in auditory nerve (AN) function contribute to suprathreshold auditory processing and communication deficits in individuals with normal hearing, hearing loss, hyperacusis, and tinnitus. Procedures to characterize AN loss or dysfunction in humans are limited. We report several novel complementary metrics to characterize AN function noninvasively in humans using the compound action potential (CAP), a direct measure of summated AN activity. We examined how these metrics change with stimulus intensity, and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas response amplitude is determined both by temporal jitter and by the response amplitudes within each trial, PLV reflects temporal jitter, independent from response amplitudes. Therefore, while PLV and response amplitudes both increase as stimulus level increases, as shown previously (Harris et al, 2018, 2021; McClaskey et al, 2020), examining these two measures together provides a means to dissociate synchrony from amplitude. PLV is calculated from a complex time-frequency transform, using the following equation, in which F k (f, t) is the spectral estimate of trial k at frequency f and time t : In this study, Hanning FFT tapers were applied to the continuous neural activity data, using the newtimef() function in EEGLAB.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whereas response amplitude is determined both by temporal jitter and by the response amplitudes within each trial, PLV reflects temporal jitter, independent from response amplitudes. Therefore, while PLV and response amplitudes both increase as stimulus level increases, as shown previously (Harris et al, 2018, 2021; McClaskey et al, 2020), examining these two measures together provides a means to dissociate synchrony from amplitude. PLV is calculated from a complex time-frequency transform, using the following equation, in which F k (f, t) is the spectral estimate of trial k at frequency f and time t : In this study, Hanning FFT tapers were applied to the continuous neural activity data, using the newtimef() function in EEGLAB.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We fit hypothesis-driven LMER models to the AN and midbrain response measurements using the lme4 package for R (x64 v4.0.5). Amplitude and PLV at each frequently were modeled separately (e.g., Harris et al, 2018, 2021; McClaskey et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, peak width and latency may be used to estimate the degeneration rate. This notion of peak width and latency being subject to the relative presence of different subpopulations (in our case healthy and degenerating neurons) has been previously described extensively by Harris et al (2018) in the context of contributions of two distinct populations of auditory nerve fibers (in their case the high-threshold low-spontaneous rate fibers and low-threshold high-spontaneous rate fibers) in the acoustically evoked CAP.…”
Section: Peak Width and Peak Area Represent Different Aspects Of Sgc ...mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Suprathreshold estimates of AN peak response amplitudes and latency, and neural synchrony (Phase-locking value: PLV) were acquired. These suprathreshold measures of the ABR have been associated with speech recognition in noise (Harris et al, 2018, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%