2017
DOI: 10.1109/maes.2017.160113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary pair radar waveforms–evaluating and mitigating some drawbacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 7 , we plot the results generated by some representative methods for a comparison. Figure 7 a is the result of standard transmission order with no receiving weights (which is identical to the Figure 4 a); Figure 7 b demonstrates the result of using the Prouhet–Thue–Morse (PTM) Design algorithm shown in [ 23 ]; Figure 7 c shows the AF of using a Hamming amplitude weighting [ 36 ] to the Golay complementary waveforms, and it has a similar performance as the Binomial Design algorithm (shown in Figure 4 b) in that it sacrifices the Doppler resolution for a larger sidelobe blanking area. Figure 7 d shows the result for applying both PTM Design algorithm and Hamming amplitude weighting.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Proposed Signal Processing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 7 , we plot the results generated by some representative methods for a comparison. Figure 7 a is the result of standard transmission order with no receiving weights (which is identical to the Figure 4 a); Figure 7 b demonstrates the result of using the Prouhet–Thue–Morse (PTM) Design algorithm shown in [ 23 ]; Figure 7 c shows the AF of using a Hamming amplitude weighting [ 36 ] to the Golay complementary waveforms, and it has a similar performance as the Binomial Design algorithm (shown in Figure 4 b) in that it sacrifices the Doppler resolution for a larger sidelobe blanking area. Figure 7 d shows the result for applying both PTM Design algorithm and Hamming amplitude weighting.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Proposed Signal Processing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a parallel direction, Suvorova et al [ 34 , 35 ] proposed an algorithm for determining the transmission order of Golay complementary waveforms using Reed–Müller codes so that the range sidelobes of AF in the region centered at a given (nonzero) target Doppler are minimized. On the other hand, Levanon et al [ 36 ] described the shortcoming of using Golay complementary waveforms and suggested methods to mitigate some of them. They indicated that a poor performance can be observed in the AF if both the transmission order algorithm and receiving weighting approach are applied rather than use only one of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary codes/sequences were originally proposed by Golay in the early 1960s [1] and have since been extensively explored (e.g. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]) as a means to completely remove autocorrelation sidelobes through combining of the pulse compressed responses resulting from pairs/sets of complementary coded pulses. However, there are two factors that limit the efficacy of complementary coding in practice: Doppler sensitivity and implementation/transmitter distortion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complementary set of sequences (CSS) [13–20] is a successful example of exploiting the interpulse diversity in suppressing the central ACF sidelobes. Ever since the concept of CSS [13] is proposed, there have been plenty of efforts [14, 15] devoted to the analytical construction of CSS for restricted sequence length N and set cardinality M .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%