2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2303.13194
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary Pseudo Multimodal Feature for Point Cloud Anomaly Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M3DM framework [39] innovatively combines 3D point data with conventional imaging for enhanced decision-making. CPMF [8] introduced a novel methodology that integrates a memory bank approach with KNN and enriches the detection process by rendering 3D data into multi-view 2D images. Conversely, EasyNet [12] presents a straightforward mechanism for 3D anomaly detection, circumventing the need for pre-training.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The M3DM framework [39] innovatively combines 3D point data with conventional imaging for enhanced decision-making. CPMF [8] introduced a novel methodology that integrates a memory bank approach with KNN and enriches the detection process by rendering 3D data into multi-view 2D images. Conversely, EasyNet [12] presents a straightforward mechanism for 3D anomaly detection, circumventing the need for pre-training.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors make it challenging to apply reconstruction-based [3] or deep learning feature extraction-based [1] algorithms widely. Secondly, the prevailing approaches for point cloud anomaly detection heavily rely on traditional feature processing operators and models that are pretrained to extract features or transform data to 2D for processing [1,8]. This approach fails to fully exploit the potential of point cloud data and leads to significant feature domain misalignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many tasks [11][12][13] are moving toward unsupervised methods based on MVTec AD [14] to carry out surface defect detection. Furthermore, several tasks [15,16] have emerged employing MVTec 3D-AD [17] for three-dimensional (3D) defect detection. These methods only need to learn the distribution of the normal training data and samples that do not belong to the normal training data distribution are labeled as abnormal during inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%