2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60112-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete and partial contour zirconia designs for crowns and fixed dental prostheses: A clinical report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
49
1
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
49
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Zirconia exists in three different crystallographic forms: cubic, tetragonal and monoclinic phases. Y-TZP shows superior performance among dental ceramics due the high strength level of more than 1000 MPa and its superior fracture toughness of 4 to 5 MPa.m 0.5 .…”
Section: Monolithic Zirconia Restorationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Zirconia exists in three different crystallographic forms: cubic, tetragonal and monoclinic phases. Y-TZP shows superior performance among dental ceramics due the high strength level of more than 1000 MPa and its superior fracture toughness of 4 to 5 MPa.m 0.5 .…”
Section: Monolithic Zirconia Restorationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although framework design and firing protocols were optimized, the cohesive fracture (chipping) and delamination of the veneering ceramic is the most common clinical complication, whilst core fracture was reported to be very infrequent (Della Bona & Kelly 2008;Land & Hopp 2010;Guess et al 2011;Marchack et al 2011;Zarone et al 2011;Ferrari et al 2015a;Ferrari et al 2015b). Consequently, fabrication strategies and techniques to eliminate the veneering ceramic were developed, till the introduction of Computer Aided Design-Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD-CAM) monolithic materials, just like zirconia and lithium disilicate (Rojas-Vizcaya 2011; Beuer et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, very few laboratory data about the mechanical predictability of monolithic zirconia crowns are available in the literature, particularly for very thin restorations (Beuer et al 2009;Choi et al 2012;Schmitter et al 2012), as well as the validation of their clinical performances in the oral environment (Sailer et al 2009;Marchack et al 2011;Ferrari et al 2015a). Previous in vitro investigations showed that monolithic zirconia SCs exhibited fracture loads higher than those of layered zirconia restorations (Dhima et al 2013;Sun et al 2014;Lan et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with these developments of the concept that if ceramic chipping could be avoided and the wear of ceramics and antagonists could be reduced [4][5][6][7][8] , the application of the veneering porcelain has been decreasing in the clinical situation. TZP could be used for fabricating high-strength monolithic restorations 9,10) and might be indicated, especially in posterior regions. It was reported that opaque TZP reduced the wear of antagonists such as human enamel 1,5,7,11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%