2017
DOI: 10.1090/tran/6825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete boundedness of heat semigroups on the von Neumann algebra of hyperbolic groups

Abstract: We prove that (λg → e −t|g| r λg)t>0 defines a completely bounded semigroup of multipliers on the von Neuman algebra of hyperbolic groups for all real number r. One ingredient in the proof is the observation that a construction of Ozawa allows to characterize the radial multipliers that are bounded on every hyperbolic graph, partially generalizing results of Haagerup-Steenstrup-Szwarc and Wysoczański. Another ingredient is an upper estimate of trace class norms for Hankel matrices, which is based on Peller's c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example we may take Γ to be a nonabelian free group or a hyperbolic Coxeter group. The following Bochner-Riesz means are studied in [MdlS17]: for a fixed δ > 1 we take…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example we may take Γ to be a nonabelian free group or a hyperbolic Coxeter group. The following Bochner-Riesz means are studied in [MdlS17]: for a fixed δ > 1 we take…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [GdlH90, Gro87] for a complete description of hyperbolic groups. We merely remind that all hyperbolic groups are weakly amenable and the completely bounded radial Fourier multipliers have been characterized in [Oza08,MdlS17]. In particular, we denote by | | the usual word length function on a hyperbolic group Γ, then the Fourier multipliers…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark. Corollary 4 (i) was proved in [28] for L : λ g → ϕ(g)λ g with ϕ a symmetric conditionally negative function on G.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…where k 0 and m 0 are defined as in (10), and satisfy k 0 Now observe that this expression corresponds to N telescoping series. Indeed, fixing j 1 , ..., j N −1 and defining…”
Section: Multi-radial Multipliers On Products Of Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%