“…The number of genes (107) annotated in the P. rubens chloroplast genome was the same as in P. jezoensis (107), lower than that annotated in the chloroplast genomes of P. sitchensis (114), P. mariana (114), P. glauca (114), P. engelmannii (114), P. neoveitchii (116), P. asperata (108), P. crassifolia (108), and P. abies (108), and higher than that annotated in P. chihuahuana (89). The protein-coding genes annotated were lower, 69 vs. 73 each in P. mariana , P. glauca, and P. engelmanii , and 72 in P. abies , P. asperata , P. crassifolia [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] ( Supplementary Table S1 ). Thus, a somewhat lower number of genes annotated is more likely due to an incomplete genome owing to the very short single-end sequence reads used in our study and less likely due to inherent differences in the chloroplast genome structure between P. rubens and 10 other Picea species, although the existence of some inherent differences cannot be ruled out.…”