2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09990-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete deconvolution of cellular mixtures based on linearity of transcriptional signatures

Abstract: Changes in bulk transcriptional profiles of heterogeneous samples often reflect changes in proportions of individual cell types. Several robust techniques have been developed to dissect the composition of such mixed samples given transcriptional signatures of the pure components or their proportions. These approaches are insufficient, however, in situations when no information about individual mixture components is available. This problem is known as the  complete deconvolution problem, where the composition i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
133
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
133
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies show that the expression profiles from each cell type are linearly additive; this makes the contribution of each cell type proportional to its fraction in the mixture profile [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies show that the expression profiles from each cell type are linearly additive; this makes the contribution of each cell type proportional to its fraction in the mixture profile [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the variation of cell-type composition also opens new avenues in analyzing a tremendous yet underexplored quantity of biomedical data that has already been collected in clinics. Therefore, a number of bulk deconvolution techniques have been proposed in the literature for analyzing cellular composition from mixture samples [12,13,16,20,28,27,34]. These techniques mainly rely on a so-called signature matrix consisting of the gene signatures chiefly of well defined cell types [2,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene expression variation of cell type markers can be also used to estimate cell type heterogeneity in bulk RNA-sequencing experiments. If the cell types within a culture have been previously well characterised, deconvolution approaches will use these profiles to estimate the cell type proportions within a heterogeneous culture (Wang et al, 2019;Zaitsev et al, 2019). However, single-marker genes can also be used.…”
Section: Identify and Remove Unwanted Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We benchmarked DeCompress performance across 6 datasets (see Supplemental Table S2): (1) insilico mixing experiments using tissue-specific expression profiles from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project (53,54), (2) expression from 4 published datasets with known compartment proportions (11,23,58,59), and (3) and tumor expression from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (43,55). We compared the performance of DeCompress against 5 other reference-free deconvolution methods (summarized in Supplemental Table S1): deconf (20), Linseed (22), DeconICA (24), iterative non-10 negative matrix factorization with feature selection using TOAST (TOAST + NMF) (25), and…”
Section: Benchmarking Decompress Against Other Reference-free Deconvomentioning
confidence: 99%