2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Disruption of the Kainate Receptor Gene Family Results in Corticostriatal Dysfunction in Mice

Abstract: Summary Kainate receptors are members of the glutamate receptor family, that regulate synaptic function in the brain. They modulate synaptic transmission and the excitability of neurons; however, their contributions to neural circuits that underlie behavior are unclear. To understand the net impact of kainate receptor signaling, we generated knockout mice in which all five kainate receptor subunits were ablated (5ko). These mice displayed compulsive and perseverative behaviors including over grooming, as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wild-type animals are C57Bl/6 from Charles River (Wilmington, MA, USA). Five-KAR subunit knockout mice were provided Dr Anis Contractor (Xu et al 2017). HNK-1ST knockout mice (B6;129-Chst10 tm1Mifu /Mmjax) were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) (RRID:MMRRC 037129-JAX).…”
Section: Ethical Approvalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wild-type animals are C57Bl/6 from Charles River (Wilmington, MA, USA). Five-KAR subunit knockout mice were provided Dr Anis Contractor (Xu et al 2017). HNK-1ST knockout mice (B6;129-Chst10 tm1Mifu /Mmjax) were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) (RRID:MMRRC 037129-JAX).…”
Section: Ethical Approvalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KCC2 interacts with the GluK2 subunit of kainate type of glutamate receptors (KARs), which play important roles in both pre and postsynaptic modulation and influence the functional development of limbic networks (Pinheiro and Mulle, 2008 ; Contractor et al, 2011 ; Lerma and Marques, 2013 ; Xu et al, 2017 ). The interaction with GluK2 regulates trafficking and surface expression of KCC2 in hippocampal neurons (Mahadevan et al, 2014 ; Pressey et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is important to recognise that no animal model can recapitulate all aspects of OCD, these experimental systems serve as valuable tools for examining component processes and pathophysiologic/therapeutic mechanisms with a level of precision that cannot be achieved in clinical research. These preclinical models, which aim to mimic disturbances hypothesised to contribute to the aetiology of OCD, have been generated through a variety of methods, including genetic manipulations (Greer and Capecchi, 2002; Shmelkov et al, 2010; Ullrich et al, 2018; Welch et al, 2007; Xu et al, 2017), pharmacological manipulations (Shanahan et al, 2009, 2011) and, more recently, neural circuit perturbations (Ahmari et al, 2013; Burguiere et al, 2013; Rapanelli et al, 2017a). A number of different behaviours relevant to OCD have been measured in these models, including compulsive self-grooming (Kalueff et al, 2016), other repetitive actions (Pogorelov et al, 2015; Xu et al, 2015; Zike et al, 2017b), prepulse inhibition (PPI; Baldan Ramsey et al, 2011; Shanahan et al, 2009) and anxiety-like behaviour (Ade et al, 2016; Shmelkov et al, 2010; Welch et al, 2007).…”
Section: Preclinical Ocd Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted to date have been underpowered, with a recent meta-analysis of the two largest studies including less than 3000 patients (International Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Foundation Genetics Collaborative (IOCDF-GC) and OCD Collaborative Genetics Association Studies (OCGAS), 2018). Nevertheless, there has been strong convergent evidence that genes expressed at the glutamatergic synapse are involved in OCD risk (Wu et al, 2012), and a number of transgenic models have attempted to test this hypothesis (Aida et al, 2015; Shmelkov et al, 2010; Welch et al, 2007; Xu et al, 2017; Zike et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Advanced Neuroscience Approaches For Gaining Mechanistic Insmentioning
confidence: 99%