2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-008-0719-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Einstein Metrics are Geodesically Rigid

Abstract: We prove that every complete Einstein (Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian) metric g is geodesically rigid: if any other complete metricḡ has the same (unparametrized) geodesics with g, then the Levi-Civita connections of g andḡ coincide.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First non-trivial examples of projectively equivalent metrics and projective transformations were discovered by Lagrange [22] and Beltrami [4]. Recently, there has been a considerable growth in interest in projective differential geometry, due to new methods that allow one to solve interesting new and classical problems, see for example [7,10,16,17,29,30,35,36,38,39].…”
Section: New Ideas Compared With [9]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First non-trivial examples of projectively equivalent metrics and projective transformations were discovered by Lagrange [22] and Beltrami [4]. Recently, there has been a considerable growth in interest in projective differential geometry, due to new methods that allow one to solve interesting new and classical problems, see for example [7,10,16,17,29,30,35,36,38,39].…”
Section: New Ideas Compared With [9]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly important case of such a study arises where the original pair (M, g) is a space-time which is also an Einstein space so that the Ricci and metric tensors are related by Ricc = R 4 g. This problem has been discussed in several places (see the bibliography in [6]). The particular case which is, perhaps, of most importance in general relativity arises when the Ricci scalar vanishes and then (M, g) is a vacuum (Ricciflat ) space-time and this is discussed in [1,3,5,8]. It turns out that if (M, g) is a space-time which is an Einstein space and if g ′ is another metric on M projectively related to g, either (M, g) and (M, g ′ ) are each of constant curvature, or the Levi-Civita connections ∇ and ∇ ′ of g and g ′ , respectively, are equal.…”
Section: Projective Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been some recent interest in the study of projective relatedness of (metric) connections and, in particular, within Einstein's theory [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Thus, roughly speaking, one assumes that one has two Lorentz metrics on a given space-time M whose Levi-Civita connections give rise to the same set of geodesic paths (unparametrised geodesics) on the space-time manifold and then tries to find the relationship between these metrics and connections.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution of the problem in the general case seems to be rather difficult and the idea is to consider certain special cases in order to make the problem more tractable. For the important situation when (M, g) is a vacuum space-time a very strong result is available and has been discovered, to a large extent independently, in [2,3,4,5]. This result says that if (M, g) is vacuum and not flat and if a space-time (M, g ) with Levi-Civita connection ∇ is projectively related to it then ∇ = ∇ (and so (M, g ) is also vacuum) and, with exclusion of the case when (M, g) is a pp-wave, g = cg for some constant c [3,4].…”
Section: Mathematical Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the problem can, to some extent, be simplified by adopting the Sinjukov transformation ( [15], see also [4,5,8,9]). This technique involves introducing another non-degenerate second order symmetric tensor a and another 1-form λ to replace g and ψ and which are defined in terms of them by…”
Section: Projective Relatednessmentioning
confidence: 99%