2021
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10186-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So that, the CME concept was based on three main points: dissection in the embryological plane, central vascular ligation, and a su cient length of resected bowel. Recently, in two systematic review, Complete mesocolic excision has showed favorite results on long-term survival outcomes, but no differences in anastomotic leak rate or perioperative mortality [11,23]. However, these reviews still have some limitations on the quality of evidence, which have no Level 1 evidence from a randomized clinical trial (RCT) [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So that, the CME concept was based on three main points: dissection in the embryological plane, central vascular ligation, and a su cient length of resected bowel. Recently, in two systematic review, Complete mesocolic excision has showed favorite results on long-term survival outcomes, but no differences in anastomotic leak rate or perioperative mortality [11,23]. However, these reviews still have some limitations on the quality of evidence, which have no Level 1 evidence from a randomized clinical trial (RCT) [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the limited randomized data available for CME surgery for colon cancer, the interest in the procedure is reflected by the fact that there were 13 systematic reviews published on the topic between 2009 and 2020, and at least an additional 9 systematic reviews published in 2021 alone. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Pathological outcomes CME with CVL has been shown to be associated with a greater distance between the tumour and vascular tie, a longer colonic specimen length, a larger mesenteric resectional area and higher lymph node yield. 13,36,43 Although higher lymph node yields have been associated with a survival benefit in patients with clinically positive and negative lymph nodes, [44][45][46][47][48] recent genomic and proteomic data have demonstrated a strong correlation between lymph node yield and immune response, where the survival advantage associated with higher lymph node yields is most likely explained by the induction of an immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This superior lymphadenectomy may account for the lower reported risk of local recurrence in some studies [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. However, several articles have shown that wider excisions did not improve oncologic benefits and CME has been associated with increasing concerns regarding the elevated morbidity and risk of postoperative complications such as injuries to the splenic and superior mesenteric veins [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%