1997
DOI: 10.3109/02844319709085480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Reduction of Lymphoedema of the Arm by Liposuction After Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
140
0
13

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
140
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…22,27,28 These volume reductions are much lower than the 87-111 % reductions we achieved with SAPL in chronic lymphedema patients, consistent with previously reported results for this procedure. 29 The safety of SAPL has been established and found not to further damage the already impaired lymphatic flow. 30 Although the procedure effectively removes excess volume and decreases infection risk, the technique does not address the pathophysiology causing the lymphedema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,27,28 These volume reductions are much lower than the 87-111 % reductions we achieved with SAPL in chronic lymphedema patients, consistent with previously reported results for this procedure. 29 The safety of SAPL has been established and found not to further damage the already impaired lymphatic flow. 30 Although the procedure effectively removes excess volume and decreases infection risk, the technique does not address the pathophysiology causing the lymphedema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the development of circumferential suction-assisted lipectomy as a treatment for lymphedema in cases in which fat hypertrophy dominates and fluid is minimal (37,38).…”
Section: Fat and Lymphaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measurements are highly biased by variations in the degree of firmness and the contour of the limb, by the tension placed on it by the tape measure, or by the fact that the swelling of the soft tissue is not uniform (5). The water displacement method of assessing arm volume is much more reliable (57,58) as it measures the arm edema volume directly in milliliters. As in this study, both arms should be measured simultaneously so that the arm edema volume can be monitored, with the contralateral arm serving as a control, thus avoiding the effect of casual variations in the general body mass.…”
Section: Volume Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The displaced water was weighed on a balance to the nearest 5 g, corresponding to 5 ml. Both arms were always measured at each visit, and the difference in arm volumes was designated as the edema volume (57,58). The decrease in the edema volume was also calculated in percent, thus:…”
Section: Arm 6olume Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%