2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.120401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Resource Theory of Quantum Incompatibility as Quantum Programmability

Abstract: Measurement incompatibility describes two or more quantum measurements whose expected joint outcome on a given system cannot be defined. This purely non-classical phenomenon provides a necessary ingredient in many quantum information tasks such violating a Bell Inequality or nonlocally steering part of an entangled state. In this paper, we characterize incompatibility in terms of programmable measurement devices and the general notion of quantum programmability. This refers to the temporal freedom a user has i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although being an abstract concept on the mathematical level, measurement incompatibility is important also from an experimental perspective. It gives rise to the non-classical behaviour in various quantum protocols such as quantum steering [2-5], contextuality [6,7], tests of macroreal-ism [8,9], quantum communication [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], and non-locality [19,20]. Crucially, any set of incompatible measurements results in genuinely quantum behavior given that one possesses a properly chosen catalyst state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although being an abstract concept on the mathematical level, measurement incompatibility is important also from an experimental perspective. It gives rise to the non-classical behaviour in various quantum protocols such as quantum steering [2-5], contextuality [6,7], tests of macroreal-ism [8,9], quantum communication [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], and non-locality [19,20]. Crucially, any set of incompatible measurements results in genuinely quantum behavior given that one possesses a properly chosen catalyst state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More broadly, the study of incompatibility as a resource for quantum information protocols has been a very active area of research in recent years [14,49,50]. Investigating the role that realizability of particular joint measurability structures can play in quantum information could lead to insights on previously under-appreciated aspects of incompatibility as well as their relevance for the foundations and applications of quantum theory.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of other QRTs have been studied in the past few years that characterize a wide range of quantum phenomena [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Despite their physical differences, these phenomena have a remarkably similar structure when viewed through the lens of a resource theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in almost all physically-motivated QRTs, the natural choice for free operations does not coincide with the maximal set. In this case, conditions for free convertibility become more complicated, generally consisting of an infinitude of monotonicity conditions [12,14,20,26,32,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. All of these complete convertibility results depend, in way or the other, on the Hyperplane Separation Theorem for convex sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%