2018
DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2018.1476995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete streets at the municipal level: A review of American municipal Complete Street Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, they address the demands of non-motorized street users and sustainable transportation. Moreover, those policies do not lead to the negotiation of tradeoff among users inside the street right-of-way; They are broad and defer to optimistic safety goals accommodating all user types equally without recognizing the accommodation's implicit hierarchy [11].…”
Section: Streets' Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, they address the demands of non-motorized street users and sustainable transportation. Moreover, those policies do not lead to the negotiation of tradeoff among users inside the street right-of-way; They are broad and defer to optimistic safety goals accommodating all user types equally without recognizing the accommodation's implicit hierarchy [11].…”
Section: Streets' Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gregg and Hess (2019) argue about the contextual analysis of public policies related to street-level research. The understanding of a complete (ideal) street is based on the components that the street has or might be induced; not necessarily based on a generic guideline [36]. Dividing the case area into multiple segments helps to understand the components of "time and rhythm" in public space [37].…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, they address the demands of non-motorized street users and sustainable transportation. Moreover, those policies do not lead to the negotiation of tradeoffs among users inside the street right-of-way; They are broad and defer to optimistic safety goals accommodating all user types equally without recognizing the accommodation’s implicit hierarchy 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%