2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2015.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete subset regressions with large-dimensional sets of predictors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In empirical work for stock returns (Elliott et al 2013) and inflation rate, GDP growth, and unemployment rate forecasts (Elliott et al 2015), Elliott et al find that the CSR forecasts perform very well compared to univariate ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average) or common factor models. Equal-weighted combinations appear to work as well as alternative combination schemes that estimate the weights of the individual forecasting models and do not sample the models at random if the total number of models is too large to allow all possible models with k predictors to be included in the combination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In empirical work for stock returns (Elliott et al 2013) and inflation rate, GDP growth, and unemployment rate forecasts (Elliott et al 2015), Elliott et al find that the CSR forecasts perform very well compared to univariate ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average) or common factor models. Equal-weighted combinations appear to work as well as alternative combination schemes that estimate the weights of the individual forecasting models and do not sample the models at random if the total number of models is too large to allow all possible models with k predictors to be included in the combination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result shows the feasibility of random subset regression in practice. It also provides a theoretical justification of the results obtained in Elliott et al (2013) and Elliott et al (2015), where it was found that little prediction accuracy is lost by using a finite number of random draws of the subsets.…”
Section: Feasibility Of the Msfe Boundsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The covariance matrix of the predictors equals Σ X = 1 p P P , where P is a p × p matrix whose elements are independently and randomly drawn from a standard normal distribution. As argued by Elliott et al (2015), this ensures that the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix are reasonably spaced.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Set-upmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations